[At-Large] I am sending this because I didn't look at the unsub link in every message

Baudouin SCHOMBE b.schombe at gmail.com
Mon Feb 20 08:06:58 UTC 2017


Hello everyone,

In my humble opinion, it would be desirable for the next General Assembly
to consider this issue.
There must be some, perhaps more obvious, reasons for this disengagement.
For 3 years, I have begun to see this disengagement. I think that there is
a problem of motivation and, more importantly, of an internal dynamic that
has formed a cyst which does not allow certain members to participate
physically and virtually enthusiastically in the course of the different
exchanges.
This is just a finding but more element of appreciation are needed to have
a certainty.


*SCHOMBE BAUDOUIN*

*SECRETAIRE EXECUTIF FGI-IGF RDC*


*COORDINATION NATIONALE CAFECICANN/AFRALO Member*
*ISOC Member*
Téléphone mobile:+243998983491/+243813684512
email                  : b.schombe at gmail.com
skype                 : b.schombe
blog                    : http://akimambo.unblog.fr




2017-02-20 9:37 GMT+02:00 John R. Levine <johnl at iecc.com>:

> But Remmy, I think we need to know as a community that people are
>> disengaging and find out why. If we actually had a comprehensive system, an
>> unsubscribe click could be responded to with a 3 question survey and an
>> opportunity to write a full statement if the person has a specific reason.
>>
>
> Which I can promise nobody would do beyond checking the box that says "yes
> I really want to unsubscribe" and maybe "too much mail."  I realize that
> some people think web discussion fora are great, but expect I am not the
> only one here who has no interest in visitng a dozen web whatsits every day
> so if I can't get it as mail, forget it.
>
> I sort of hate to bring up user education, but every mail program in the
> world has fairly easy ways to sort list mail into separate folders, which
> lets you read it when you want.  Evidently a lot of people can't don't
> think it's worth the 30 seconds needed to do that, so I think the real
> problem is that there is vanishingly little signal on this list.  Most of
> it is administrative chitchat that most people don't care about, and much
> of what's left is random tangents unrelated to anything ICANN might do
> (something of which I am far from innocent.)
>
> So on the principle of not saying anything when I have nothing to say,
> I'll stop now.
>
> R's,
> John
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20170220/5ad6db5b/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the At-Large mailing list