[At-Large] R: CCWG Accountability WorkStream 2 Questions on ICANN Jurisdiction

[Vanda Scartezini]

Roberto 
Will become worse for while, but we are also seeing huge reaction from inside US, so my expectation will be only mild changes on the Internet, if any ( more probably) , and in the free circulation of people to and from US. 
I do not believe that jurisdiction of ICANN will affect more than normally happens related to visa issues, other countries do have restrictions too and some are more unpredictable then US.
If it will happen any relevant interference on Internet ( $ power will forbid, I believe)then will be time to rethink the jurisdiction. Till then I do not believe in huge impact. 
 My 0,00002 cents 

Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 
Sorry for any typos. 
HAPPY 2017!
 
 
 

On 2/7/17, 12:14 PM, "Roberto Gaetano" <at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com> wrote:

    Actually, I was thinking in terms of similar lines, but also wondering whether under the Trump administration the jurisdiction issue would not become worse.
    R.
    
    
    > -----Messaggio originale-----
    > Da: at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large-
    > bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Per conto di Robert Guerra
    > Inviato: martedì 7 febbraio 2017 15:02
    > A: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
    > Cc: ALAC Working List; At-Large Worldwide
    > Oggetto: Re: [At-Large] CCWG Accountability WorkStream 2 Questions on
    > ICANN Jurisdiction
    > 
    > I would hope that Cuban and Iranian internet users reply to this
    > questionnaire.
    > 
    > regards
    > 
    > Robert
    > 
    > --
    > Robert Guerra
    > Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom
    > Email: rguerra at privaterra.org
    > PGP Keys : https://keybase.io/rguerra
    > 
    > On 7 Feb 2017, at 6:35, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
    > 
    > > Dear colleagues,
    > >
    > > on the ICANN evolution working group's last call (
    > > https://community.icann.org/x/F47RAw ) we had a very healthy
    > > discussion on the topic of ICANN Jurisdiction which one of the CCWG
    > > Accountability workstream 2 sub-groups is addressing. The sub-group
    > > has sent out a short questionnaire to collect input from the
    > > community. This is attached.
    > >
    > > The questions are:
    > >
    > > 1. Has your business, your privacy or your ability to use or purchase
    > > domain name-related services been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction* in
    > > any way?
    > > If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or
    > > incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any
    > > relevant documents. Please note that “affected” may refer to positive
    > > and/or negative effects.
    > > 2. Has ICANN's jurisdiction* affected any dispute resolution process
    > > or litigation related to domain names you have been involved in?
    > > If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or
    > > incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any
    > > relevant documents. Please note that “affected” may refer to positive
    > > and/or negative effects.
    > > 3. Do you have copies of and/or links to any verifiable reports of
    > > experiences of other parties that would be responsive to the questions
    > > above? If the answer is yes, please provide these copies and/or links.
    > > 4. a. Are you aware of any material, documented instance(s) where
    > > ICANN has been unable to pursue its Mission because of its
    > > jurisdiction?* If so, please provide documentation.
    > > b. Are you aware of and able to document the existence of an
    > > alternative jurisdiction where ICANN would not be so prevented from
    > > pursuing its Mission? If so, please provide documentation.
    > >
    > > Please be so kind to let us know your answers.
    > >
    > > Kindest regards,
    > >
    > > Olivier
    > > (for the At-Large ICANN evolution working group)
    > > _______________________________________________
    > > At-Large mailing list
    > > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
    > > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
    > >
    > > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
    > _______________________________________________
    > At-Large mailing list
    > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
    > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
    > 
    > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
    _______________________________________________
    At-Large mailing list
    At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
    https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
    
    At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org