[At-Large] CCWG Accountability WorkStream 2 Questions on ICANN Jurisdiction

Robert Guerra rguerra at privaterra.org
Tue Feb 7 14:01:52 UTC 2017


I would hope that Cuban and Iranian internet users reply to this 
questionnaire.

regards

Robert

--
Robert Guerra
Twitter: twitter.com/netfreedom
Email: rguerra at privaterra.org
PGP Keys : https://keybase.io/rguerra

On 7 Feb 2017, at 6:35, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> on the ICANN evolution working group's last call (
> https://community.icann.org/x/F47RAw ) we had a very healthy 
> discussion
> on the topic of ICANN Jurisdiction which one of the CCWG 
> Accountability
> workstream 2 sub-groups is addressing. The sub-group has sent out a
> short questionnaire to collect input from the community. This is 
> attached.
>
> The questions are:
>
> 1. Has your business, your privacy or your ability to use or purchase
> domain name-related services been affected by ICANN's jurisdiction* in
> any way?
> If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or
> incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any
> relevant documents. Please note that “affected” may refer to 
> positive
> and/or negative effects.
> 2. Has ICANN's jurisdiction* affected any dispute resolution process 
> or
> litigation related to domain names you have been involved in?
> If the answer is Yes, please describe specific cases, situations or
> incidents, including the date, the parties involved, and links to any
> relevant documents. Please note that “affected” may refer to 
> positive
> and/or negative effects.
> 3. Do you have copies of and/or links to any verifiable reports of
> experiences of other parties that would be responsive to the questions
> above? If the answer is yes, please provide these copies and/or links.
> 4. a. Are you aware of any material, documented instance(s) where 
> ICANN
> has been unable to pursue its Mission because of its jurisdiction?* If
> so, please provide documentation.
> b. Are you aware of and able to document the existence of an 
> alternative
> jurisdiction where ICANN would not be so prevented from pursuing its
> Mission? If so, please provide documentation.
>
> Please be so kind to let us know your answers.
>
> Kindest regards,
>
> Olivier
> (for the At-Large ICANN evolution working group)
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org


More information about the At-Large mailing list