[At-Large] R: R: Is ICANN's oversight really moving away from the US government?

McTim dogwallah at gmail.com
Tue Apr 26 21:45:02 UTC 2016


On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Pranesh Prakash <pranesh at cis-india.org> wrote:
> Dear Vanda,
>
> Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org> [2016-04-26 19:25:18 +0000]:
>>
>> Yes Leon i agree with your thesis more registry/ registrar makes their
>> association strong not the government of the country where they are located
>
>
> Could you please point me to the Registry or Registrar association in the US
> that opposed domain name seizures? I would be much obliged.

i2c does quite a bit of that sort of that.  Many registrars and
hosting providers in that one.

theDNA.org should probably take up that sort of thing, but they are
fairly nascent.





>
> Regards,
> Pranesh
>
>
> --
> Pranesh Prakash
> Policy Director, Centre for Internet and Society
> http://cis-india.org | tel:+91 80 40926283
> sip:pranesh at ostel.co | xmpp:pranesh at cis-india.org
> https://twitter.com/pranesh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org



-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel


More information about the At-Large mailing list