[At-Large] [lac-discuss-en] Issues regarding the Lack of Accountability and Transparency in LACRALO

[Humberto Carrasco]

Dear all,

We hope we can answer this "statement" soon. I believe everybody needs to know "all" the problematic.
However, I will focus my energy on trying to solve the division between Caribbean and Latin American ALSs. This is my main concern as elected LACRALO Chair.

Regards



Enviado desde mi iPhone

> El 18-02-2016, a las 11:50 p.m., Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> escribió:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Honestly I am not sure I have good clarity yet on what ICANN staff would have done differently (well except for the Ombudsman's response). I think staff tries to provide information and facts as much as possible while leaving it to the community to decide(which is the right thing to do in this situation).
> 
> We probably would have had issues as well if staff used veto over the decision of LACRALO leadership, as certain level of independence is required.
> 
> Overall, I think this is a very delicate situation and we need to be careful on how we handle this without giving the impression that we as a community cannot resolve our challenges internally without relying on staff. I think bullet point 2 of the document shared by Dave is a critical thing we need to look at.
> 
> I am particularly concerned that this issue has lingered thus far. I encourage the ALAC Chair to give this issue full priority(just incase this hasn't happen), it's also something the ALT can take-up formerly pending review of ALAC process.
> 
> Regards
> 
>> On 19 Feb 2016 12:53 a.m., "Bill Silverstein" <icann-list at sorehands.com> wrote:
>> How about a class action against ICANN for the damage they caused by
>> overloading all our irony detectors?
>> 
>> I am confused. How is can a organization founded upon lack of
>> accountability and lack of transparency discuss standards for
>> accountability and transparency?
>> 
>> On Thu, February 18, 2016 2:25 pm, John R. Levine wrote:
>> >>> 1. ....I am
>> >>> afraid that this is currently been carried out within ICANN staff and I
>> >>> cannot provide further details other than to say something is
>> >>> happening.
>> >>
>> >> Does anyone other than myself find it ironic that a discussion of
>> >> accountability and transparency is, itself, subject to a lack of both
>> >> accountability and transparency?
>> >
>> > This is ICANN.  Our irony-o-meters burned out years ago.
>> >
>> > R's,
>> > John
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > At-Large mailing list
>> > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>> >
>> > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>> >
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> At-Large mailing list
>> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>> 
>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> 
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20160219/deb97fd9/attachment.html>