[At-Large] [ALAC] Acknowledgment of Second At-Large Summit Declaration

[Carlton Samuels]

Thanks Sebastien.

I figured you were among them.  Truly appreciate that gesture.

I posit now that a resolution be passed at an appropriate time by the ALAC
to acknowledge your unstinting service to the ATLAS agenda at the Board
level.

-Carlton


==============================
Carlton A Samuels
Mobile: 876-818-1799
*Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================

On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Sébastien Bachollet <
sebastien at bachollet.com> wrote:

> Hello Evan,
> Thanks for your question.
>
> I am one of the 3.
> (I don’t know what is public or not, then I will not put their name here
> and
> talk on their behalf.)
>
> And my suggestion was to add the following text:
> and will study possible plans to make the At-Large summit a regular
> occurrence.
>
> May I suggest that in the work currently done by At-Large to « explain »
> the
> declaration, to add the idea (request, demande…) of a regular occurrence of
> ATLAS, as a conclusion?
>
> Ready to answer other question and to help.
> All the best
>
> Sébastien Bachollet
> +33 6 07 66 89 33
> Blog: http://sebastien.bachollet.fr/
> Mail: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com>
>
> De :  Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org>
> Date :  vendredi 12 septembre 2014 17:26
> À :  Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com>
> Cc :  At-Large Worldwide <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>, ALAC Working
> List <alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Objet :  Re: [ALAC] Acknowledgment of Second At-Large Summit Declaration
>
> > Hi Sebastien,
> >
> > Thanks for forwarding this.
> >
> >
> >> Note: Three voting members of the Board abstained from voting on the
> >> ​[ATLASII] ​
> >> resolutions. They stated for the record that they were supportive of the
> >> work resulting from the ATLAS, but wanted to draw attention to their
> >> encouragement for the Board to take future consideration of plans to
> >> develop the ATLAS into a regularly occurring event.
> >
> > ​Could you please offer any more detail on this?
> >
> > Does this indicate that some of the Board members did not agree that the
> Board
> > should just accept the ATLAS results, but also to confirm it as a
> recurring
> > event? Or am I interpreting this incorrectly?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > - Evan​
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>