[At-Large] FRIENDLY REMINDER: Review on Trusted Community Representation #Root #Zone #DNSSEC [Call for Comments]

Aida Noblia aidanoblia at gmail.com
Tue Feb 4 20:37:46 UTC 2014


Dear Oliver :Thank you for your explanation. I sent a comment yesterday
LACRALO list, but in Spanish. Today saw the urgent request of Salanieta and
sent the comment translated, but my English is not good ..

Best Regards
Aída


2014-02-04 Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>:

> Dear Aida,
>
> thank you for your comments which I am asking staff to include on the
> WIKI. Anonymous comments are current turned off due to a recent spam
> attack.
> Comments may also be forwarded by email to staff at atlarge.icann.org
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
> On 04/02/2014 20:42, Aida Noblia wrote:
> > Dear Salanieta:
> >
> >   I was unable to add my comments on the wiki because the editor does not
> > load, although I tried several times.
> >
> > My comment was sent yesterday LACRALO <
> > lac-discuss-es at atlarge-lists.icann.org> list in spanish, and I copy this
> > below,  with a variant cleared on that list in another mail, in which I
> > send it deleted the wrong paragraph .
> >
> > Best Regards
> >
> >
> > I agree with the draft Salanieta with the observations made by Olivier ,
> > except the issue of financing , which I agree with Alexander. The word "
> > sacred " could be changed to " solemn " because it is a solemnity and
> > compliance is an essential requirement in the process of KSK .
> >
> > Responsibility regarding the control of TCR , which mentions Alexander on
> > ensuring transparency , accountability , and defending the Internet
> users,
> > and is set to generic point 9 of the Statement of Commitment between the
> > Department of Commerce U.S. and ICANN , (the first document cited by
> > Salanieta ) .
> >
> >  Moreover, the entire process of the ceremony itself is a guarantee of
> > transparency and protection of users . There are strict controls and
> > detailed in the DNSSEC Practice Statement of the procedure for
> > accreditation of entry of persons, etc., for the Root Zone Operator (TCR
> )
> > , your responsibilities are established and each of the steps you must
> > follow what is proper documents governing safety at these levels of the
> > root.
> >
> >  There are also prerequisites for the selection and appointment of the
> TCR
> > , instructions for its function.That's part of the technical process of
> the
> > company Verisign , specialist in informatic security .
> >
> >  As for the number of TCR , understand that it is reasonable and who
> > applied for the position, must know and accept their demands were
> selected
> > according to rules and monitored compliance with requirements and is
> > scheduled for the 21 selected will be appointed only some will setected
> ( 6
> > or 8) for two ceremonies that simultaneously at different locations each
> > year in four opportunities . The amount would be more to cover possible
> > contingencies.
> >
> > Regarding see major funding strictly maintain the independence of the
> > process being controlled , between those who are appointed to control the
> > process and who is responsible of it, in these last ICANN. This, besides
> > exposing Alexander and there are many whose travel costs that could and
> > perhaps should be without, given the possibility of remote participation
> ,
> > which is not the case of the TCR , which have be physically present .
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2014-02-04 Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <
> > salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Dear All,
> >>
> >> The call for comments from At Large closes on 7th February, 2014.
> >>
> >> There is currently some difference in views on whether the Trusted
> >> Community Representatives (TCRs) should have indefinite terms of whether
> >> this should rotated.
> >>
> >> Should TCRs continue to remain self funded or should they be funded?
> >>
> >> There are also a few other important aspects of this that we would like
> to
> >> consult the wider community on before amending the draft. For those of
> you
> >> who have already commented, thank you. I am mindful that we still have
> not
> >> heard from others. Feel free to comment directly on the wiki via the
> link
> >> below or by responding to this thread.
> >>
> >> https://community.icann.org/x/nge6Ag
> >>
> >> Your input into this process will help us finalize the Draft. May we
> have
> >> your views please?
> >>
> >> Kind Regards,
> >> Sala
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <
> >> salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear All,
> >>>
> >>> This is just a friendly reminder in case you missed it that there is an
> >>> ongoing Review on Trusted Community Representation in Root Zone DNSSEC
> >> Key
> >>> Signing Ceremonies. Grateful if the RALO Chairs could also ask their
> >>> members for their views.
> >>>
> >>> For the benefit of the general community at large and those who have
> just
> >>> entered the community, you would have been advised at some point that
> >>> anyone in At Large can have their say on aspects of Policies either
> >>> individually as you comment directly on the site to the staff concerned
> >> or
> >>> as we in the At Large community do it through the At Large channels by
> >> way
> >>> of the "Wiki" or through email discussions.
> >>>
> >>> If you would like to comment on the Draft Statement currently being
> >>> developed by the At Large on this matter, visit:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://community.icann.org/display/alacpolicydev/At-Large+Review+of+Trusted+Community+Representation+in+Root+Zone+DNSSEC+Key+Signing+Ceremonies+Workspace?focusedCommentId=46498543#comment-46498543
> >>> If you are finding that you have difficulties posting your comment on
> the
> >>> wiki, feel free to respond to this thread and post your thoughts. On
> the
> >>> wiki you will see that the Review Team had laid several questions for
> the
> >>> public and wider community. This can help guide your comments and to
> >> have a
> >>> fair idea of the areas that they want and value your feedback on. The
> At
> >>> Large will close the call for comments on the 7th of February, 2014 so
> >> get
> >>> your thoughts in if you want them factored in.
> >>>
> >>> In case you do not have a profile to enable you to post on the Wiki
> >> (ICANN
> >>> Confluence) - please contact At Large staff offline.
> >>>
> >>> Kind Regards,
> >>> Sala
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> At-Large mailing list
> >> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> >>
> >> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>



-- 
Aida Noblia



More information about the At-Large mailing list