[At-Large] [APAC-Discuss] ccTLD Revocation

[Sala T]

Dear Rinalia,

I foresee two options, the response can be three fold:

1) Through contribution to At Large; (we will try and expedite this)
2)Through contribution to the GAC;
3)Through contributions by ccTLD managers to the ccNSO

Because it is an important issue, it is critical that consultation goes right down to the communities. Hence our reaching out.

Kind Regards,
Sala

Sent from my iPad

> On Nov 21, 2013, at 10:09 AM, Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Sala,
> 
> There is time for input, but the urgency level must be maintained as the ALAC is scheduled to vote on the statement on 12th December. I recognize that the issue affects many interested parties, which is why I sent out a second call for comments recently.  I look forward to more input on the important topic of revocation from the community with Maureen's mobilization and coordination.
> 
> Thank you for your help.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Rinalia
> 
> 
>> On Nov 21, 2013 8:48 PM, "Sala T" <sala at pasifikanexus.nu> wrote:
>> Dear Rinalia,
>> 
>> Thank you for this. Since this first came out, I had sent it to the region and also to the Regulators, ccTLD managers and Government Policy makers. I had a meeting with Pacific Regional Regulators Resource Center which is a unit comprising all the Regulators and Policy makers. Some of them are also members of ALSes in the Pacific.
>> 
>> There was overwhelming response that they were busy with Plenipotentiary preparations.
>> 
>> I will be having another meeting with some of them for the purpose of feeding into the process and hopefully by crowd-sourcing where there are geographical challenges. I will work with Maureen to feed this into the wiki etc. This may involve having a specific webinar and will brief Maureen and get her to take the lead on this as she is ALAC and ccNSO liaison.
>> 
>> Please give us time to put submissions in.
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> Sala
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> > On Nov 19, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Rinalia Abdul Rahim <rinalia.abdulrahim at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear At-Large Colleagues,
>> >
>> > The ALAC is preparing a statement on the topic of ccTLD "revocation", which
>> > refers to a process where the IANA Operator rescinds the responsibility for
>> > the management of a ccTLD from the manager.  In such a situation, a country
>> > code Top Level Domain will be re-delegated without the consent of the
>> > incumbent ccTLD manager in cases where there are “persistent problems with
>> > the operations of the domain” and where there continues to be “substantial
>> > misbehavior” on the part of ccTLD managers despite the IANA Operator’s best
>> > efforts to stop the misconduct.
>> >
>> > A draft statement has been prepared and is available for your input/comment
>> > on the following wikipage:
>> > https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=43980716
>> >
>> > If you have thoughts or opinions on this topic, please do provide your
>> > input/comments on the wikipage.
>> >
>> > Thank you.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Rinalia
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > APAC-Discuss mailing list
>> > APAC-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss
>> >
>> > Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org