[At-Large] FW: Update on the RAA Negotiations Since Prague

Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com
Mon Sep 10 02:04:16 UTC 2012


On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net>wrote:

> Hi Carlton
>
> Privacy was one of the really hard issues that the Whois Review had to
> grapple with.  If you look at the initial report (as opposed to the Final
> and Final Final reports) two privacy issues are there. The first is how to
> determine registrant eligibility for the privacy server.  Should it be
> confined to individuals, or include organisations (clear candidates would
> be human rights groups in many countries, womens' refuges etc)  Trying to
> define eligibility will be a challenge.   The other challenge is to define
> who has legitimate access to the contact information held by the privacy
> server. 'Law enforcement agencies' was the initial thought.  But in some
> countries, private organisations also perform law enforcement tasks under
> contract to the agency.  They are performing legitimate law enforcement
> tasks but aren't themselves, agencies.  Should they have access.  Even more
> difficult are the countries where the state itself is the oppressor - and
>  its 'law enforcement' agencies a!
>  re the very reason for the need for privacy.
>

Noting that there are two Studies currently being undertaken by experts on
the Whois Proxy & Privacy Study and Whois Proxy and Privacy Relay and
Reveal Study which the global community was informed would conclude in 2012
but there has been a shift in when the outcome of this Study will be
delivered which is now 2013, it follows that the Policy or PDP process will
no doubt have to factor the results into the mix.  However, this is not to
say that discussions should wait for the results of the Studies, I think
some work should be done now and a good starting point could to create a
temporary baseline modelled around the findings Council of European
National TLD Registries.

>
> I'm sure that is the reason the Final Final report backed away from any
> details on the proposal - and probably why discussion is being fostered now.
>
> I suspect there will be many varied and divergent views within ALAC - all
> of them legitimate. Providing input on what is a complex, vexed issue will
> be a challenge for GAC - and for ALAC.
>
> Holly
>
> On 08/09/2012, at 12:46 AM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
>
> > FYI.  Note the specific request for advice via GAC on data protection.
> > - Carlton
> >
> > ==============================
> > Carlton A Samuels
> > Mobile: 876-818-1799
> > *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
> > =============================
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Kurt Pritz <kurt.pritz at icann.org>
> > Date: Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:26 PM
> > Subject: [soac-discussion] FW: Update on the RAA Negotiations Since
> Prague
> > To: "soac-discussion at icann.org" <soac-discussion at icann.org>
> > Cc: Matt Serlin <matt.serlin at markmonitor.com>
> >
> >
> > Dear SO/AC Chairs,
> >
> > ****
> >
> > Recognizing the broad interest in the ICANN community on the RAA
> > negotiations,  we wanted to provide you with a brief update on the work
> > conducted since the Prague Meeting for you to share with your members.
> >
> > ****
> >
> > Since Prague, the negotiation teams have reviewed the input received from
> > the Community in order to identify possible path forwards on the complex
> > issues that have been put on the table in these negotiations.  Several
> > meetings have taken place and are scheduled prior to Toronto, including
> > plans to invite the GAC to provide input from data protection experts on
> > several specific issues.  There is also an agreement among the
> negotiation
> > teams to begin analysis of a potential framework for a privacy/proxy
> > accreditation program to be explored with the broader ICANN community.
> >
> > ****
> >
> > For more information on these important negotiations, please visit the
> > ICANN wiki at:
> >
> https://community.icann.org/display/RAA/Negotiations+Between+ICANN+and+Registrars+to+Amend+the+Registrar+Accreditation+Agreement
> >
> > ****
> >
> > Sincerely,
> >
> > ****
> >
> > Kurt Pritz (ICANN) and Matt Serlin (MarkMonitor)
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ****
> >
> > ** **
> > <smime.p7s>_______________________________________________
> > At-Large mailing list
> > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> >
> > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>



-- 
Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
P.O. Box 17862
Suva
Fiji

Twitter: @SalanietaT
Skype:Salanieta.Tamanikaiwaimaro
Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851



More information about the At-Large mailing list