[At-Large] [WHOIS-WG] Fwd: WHOIS Policy Review Team Final Report

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Thu May 17 10:48:27 UTC 2012


As far as I know the answer is no.

avri


Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> wrote:

>I've not read the report carefully, but seems very many efforts made
>to discuss with law enforcement,  comprehensive outreach to the that
>community.  Much less mention of data protection/privacy
>commissioners. Interested to know if data protection commissioners
>were consulted on the final draft before it was released.
>
>Adam
>
>
>
>On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com>
>wrote:
>> On 05/14/2012 03:46 PM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
>>> Dear Wendy:
>>> So noted.
>>>
>>> I would encourage you to lay out the reasoning for your position to
>this
>>> list as well as on the wiki.
>>
>> I have asked for a redline of the report against its draft version,
>but
>> in the meantime, repeat the NCSG's concerns that privacy should be
>given
>> much more substantial weight in the WHOIS analysis:
>>
>>
>>
>http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-rt-draft-final-report/msg00020.html
>>  The report should explicitly recommend that WHOIS policy recognize
>>  that registrants, both individual and organizations, commercial and
>>  non-commercial, have a legitimate interest in, and in many
>jurisdictions
>>  the legal right to, the privacy of their personal data.
>>
>>  In the normative discussion, privacy should be given equivalent
>emphasis
>>  to accuracy. It would be instructive in this regard to reference the
>>  OECD privacy guidelines, agreed to by all OECD member countries with
>input
>>  from business and civil society. Data accuracy (or 'quality') is
>considered
>>  by OECD members to be of equal importance to purpose specification,
>use
>>  limitation and security safeguards, none of which factors are
>supported by
>>  Whois as it currently operates. (OECD Guideline reference:
>>
> http://www.oecd.org/document/18/0,3343,en_2649_34255_1815186_1_1_1_1,00.html
>>  )
>>
>>  It is as important that registrants have privacy as that
>>  their data be accurately recorded. At the moment, the report
>appears,
>>  from its emphasis on access and accuracy, to discount those privacy
>>  concerns that are accepted by all OECD member states and
>participating
>>  business and civil society actors as having equal importance.
>>
>> --Wendy
>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> - Carlton
>>>
>>> ==============================
>>> Carlton A Samuels
>>> Mobile: 876-818-1799
>>> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
>>> =============================
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com>
>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 05/13/2012 05:26 PM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Speaking as Chair of the At-Large WHOIS WG, I shall recommend that
>the
>>>> ALAC
>>>>> issue a statement fully endorsing the recommendations of the Final
>Report
>>>>
>>>> As a member of the WG, I recommend against that.
>>>>
>>>> --Wendy
>>>>
>>>>> - Carlton
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ==============================
>>>>> Carlton A Samuels
>>>>> Mobile: 876-818-1799
>>>>> *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
>>>>> =============================
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> **
>>>>>  [image: ICANN] <http://www.icann.org/> News Alert
>>>>>
>>>>>
>http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-11may12-en.htm
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> WHOIS Policy Review Team Final Report
>>>>>
>>>>> 11 May 2012
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  *Forum Announcement:* Comment Period Opens on *Date:* 11 May 2012
> *
>>>>> Categories/Tags:*
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviews/Improvements
>>>>> WHOIS Policy
>>>>> Transparency/Accountability
>>>>>  *Purpose (Brief):* The WHOIS Policy Review Team, constituted
>under
>>>> ICANN's
>>>>> Affirmation of Commitments (AoC) agreement with the U.S.
>Department of
>>>>> Commerce, submitted its *Final Report and
>>>>> Recommendations<
>>>>
>http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/whois/final-report-11may12-en.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>> * to the ICANN Board and this document has been posted for public
>>>> comment.
>>>>> *Public Comment Box Link:*
>>>>>
>>>>
>http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/whois-rt-final-report-11may12-en.htm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  This message was sent to carlton.samuels at gmail.com from:
>>>>>
>>>>> ICANN | 4676 Admiralty Way Suite 330 | Marina del Rey, CA
>90292-6601
>>>>>
>>>>> Email Marketing by [image: iContact - Try It
>>>>> Free!]<http://www.icontact.com/a.pl/144186>
>>>>>     Manage Your Subscription
>>>>> <
>>>>
>http://app.icontact.com/icp/mmail-mprofile.pl?r=22552788&l=6333&s=60BX&m=882330&c=165637
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> WHOIS-WG mailing list
>>>>> WHOIS-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/whois-wg
>>>>>
>>>>> WHOIS WG Wiki:
>>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Whois+Policy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org +1 617.863.0613
>>>> Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project
>>>> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
>>>> http://wendy.seltzer.org/
>>>> https://www.chillingeffects.org/
>>>> https://www.torproject.org/
>>>> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org +1 617.863.0613
>> Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project
>> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
>> http://wendy.seltzer.org/
>> https://www.chillingeffects.org/
>> https://www.torproject.org/
>> http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
>> _______________________________________________
>> At-Large mailing list
>> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>>
>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>_______________________________________________
>At-Large mailing list
>At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
>At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org




More information about the At-Large mailing list