[At-Large] Notice of Motion: update to ALAC advice on gTLDs
cdel at firsthand.net
Mon Dec 19 09:34:46 UTC 2011
The Public Interest is not definable by or amenable to micro managers. All one can do is be open to structuring opportunities to focus calls for expressions and discussions of interests.
In ICANN, ALAC is one such opportunity. GAC is another. The constituent organisations such as the RIRs have their own local versions. They attract different publics and so may agree on interests or not depending on subject matter at hand.
The interests being made public are by definition public interests. This should not be confused with The Public Interest which is an abstraction. If ALAC as a public interests body states something then whether this statement of public interests is seen as The Public Interest depends on the credibility of ALAC in making such a statement and comparison of its view with those of others.
Isn't this the main rationale for maintaining the multi stakeholder model for the Internet?
So the idea of defining The Public Interest in advance is putting a phliosophical cart before the horse. The Public Interest or Interests are an emergent property not a precondition.
In my view ALAC and At Large have sufficient credibility in topics such as gTLDs so that it's statements are at least considered as serious contributions towards developing a broader appreciation of what constitutes The Public Interest.
Christian de Larrinaga
On 19 Dec 2011, at 00:42, Antony Van Couvering <avc at avc.vc> wrote:
> Dear Olivier,
> If only it were that simple. Sending me a reading list won't solve the problem, which is real.
> At the ICANN meeting in Singapore, the issue of the public interest came up at the public forum. Steve Del Bianco told the ICANN Board that the term "pubic interest" should be defined, and that set off a series of statements by the Board either pro or con for attempting a definition of "public interest." Nobody on the floor or on the Board suggested that there was a definition, and indeed the whole argument that ensued was whether a definition should be attempted -- the clear inference being that none existed. See http://singapore41.icann.org/meetings/singapore2011/transcript-public-forum-23jun11-en.txt (search on "delbianco" to get to the right section).
> Furthermore, the GAC claims to represent the public interest. If ALAC and the GAC disagree, which position represents the public interest? Is it GAC's position, which is to accept the Board's ruling that consensus exists and that we are now moving ahead with the program, or is it ALAC's, which is to reject the notion that there was consensus?
> I said before that the ALAC was set up to represent the public interest. I was wrong. The ICANN Bylaws establishing the ALAC say nothing about it representing the public interest. Instead, it speaks of ALAC representing the views of individual Internet users (see http://www.icann.org/en/general/bylaws.htm#XI - Article IX.2.4)
> What is the public interest and who represents it? If the suggestion is that ALAC does, what is the basis of this claim?
> I appreciate that it might not be everyone's favorite idea of a fun time to examine this question, but before ALAC sends a letter claiming to represent the public interest, these issues need to be cleared up or the letter might be dismissed as illegitimate.
> On Dec 18, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond wrote:
>> Dear Anthony,
>> On 18/12/2011 23:45, Antony Van Couvering wrote :
>>> I know that ALAC was set up to represent the public interest, but I am unaware of any evidence that it does.
>>> In order to represent the public interest, ALAC must first define what that is.
>> Thank you for your suggestion. In the interest of the ALAC not wasting
>> time on re-inventing the wheel, I may recommend some reading from
>> scholars who have spent time studying the subject:
>> If you'd prefer more legitimate reading material for the holiday break,
>> I'd suggest a search for "the public interest" @ Amazon and you'll find
>> a handful of books that treat the subject with all of the magnificence
>> that the subject deserves.
>> I encourage other At-Large members to share their reading list too.
>> Kind regards,
>> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
More information about the At-Large