[At-Large] Notice of Motion: update to ALAC advice on gTLDs

[Alan Greenberg]

They did give an explanation, albeit not a particularly satisfying 
one, nor even one that stands up to scrutiny (in my opinion). They 
said that "Assistance is limited to the available funding, thereby 
mitigating risk." The risk of deferring at least a reasonable amount 
of return-to-reserve is one that they have accepted in the past 
without any substantial rationale that it was a risky decision.

Alan

At 18/12/2011 01:30 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:

>WHEREAS the ICANN Board, without explanation, has refused the
>cross-community endorsement of the Joint Applicant Support Working Group
>recommendations to reduce costs of new gTLD in developing economies
>independent of any fixed fund;