[At-Large] [NA-Discuss] GAC Scorecard Comments due by 25 March
evan at telly.org
Thu Mar 24 04:33:45 UTC 2011
On 23 March 2011 22:14, Hong Xue <hongxueipr at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Evan,
> Many thanks for the added part on PDPDR. It is terrific.
> For substantive evaluation, I do see your point but still cannot go with
> GAC. No rule-making can satisfy all the parties and interests. We can only
> stick to our priority and focus. If at-large has to pick a side between
> trademark registrants and new gTLD applicants, I'd rather choose the latter
> if free speech and free flow of information are implicated by the
OK. I've also noticed Olivier's endorsement of your position.
I've removed the substantive evaluation component from the 'endorsed GAC
More information about the At-Large