[APAC-Discuss] Please comment ...

[Karaitiana Taiuru]

Considering Sovereign States and Indigenous Peoples have been ignored by
the ICANN CCTLD process, It is important that these major groups are
considered in the process. Therefore i would argue that special
consideration is given to these groups in a similar manner to CCTLD
operators or at least have them open as GTLD's.

Karaitiana Taiuru

On 22 September 2015 at 19:18, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Country codes are traditionally a 2-letter string. The new gTLD process is
> enabling country and territory codes to be expanded to 3-letters (or even
> as whole names).
>
>
>
> The “Cross Community Working Group for the Use of Country and Territory
> Names as Top Level Domains” is asking:
>
>
>
> 1. Should these new 3-letter country/territory codes be reserved ONLY as
> ccTLDs *OR* should they be open to everyone as gTLDs?  (This question
> refers to 3-letter code IDN ccTLDs and IDN gTLDs as well)
>
>
>
> 2. What advantages or disadvantages does your answer offer either group
> (ccTLDs or gTLDs)?
>
>
>
> Please return your answers to these two questions to me asap. J
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> APAC-Discuss mailing list
> APAC-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss
>
> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/apac-discuss/attachments/20150923/34334c35/attachment-0001.html>