[APAC-Discuss] Beijing meeting - your input

[Adam Peake]

(not sending this to apralo-beijing-oc at atlarge-lists.icann.org as I'm
not a member.)

Good proposal, however, I wouldn't discuss WCIT.  It's over, there
will be implications, but they will be hard to divine and will involve
a lot of guesswork.  Not sure of the value.

More relevant is the next ITU process, WTPF (World Telecommunication
Policy Forum <http://www.itu.int/en/wtpf-13/Pages/default.aspx>)  The
theme of the meeting is "International Internet-related public policy
matters".  It will be held May 14-16, so there is a chance to
influence people attending (ICANN will for sure, as will APNIC, many
of the ccTLDs, ISOC etc.)

WTPF will "discuss all Internet-related public policy issues raised in
Resolutions 101, 102 and 133 (Rev. Guadalajara, 2010)"

Resolution 101 Internet Protocol-based networks
Resolution 102 ITU's role with regard to international public policy
issues pertaining to the Internet and the management of Internet
resources, including domain names and addresses
Resolution 133 Role of administrations of Member States in the
management of internationalized (multilingual) domain names

each attached.

Having IDNs on the WTPF agenda makes it even more relevant (agneda item 3.)

There will be carry-over from WCIT (expect the resolution on Internet
particularly) to WTPF.

People to invite: APNIC (Paul Wilson, Pablo Hinojosa) and ISOC (Raj
Singh, Constance Bommelaer, Markus Kummer).  Look around for
government reps:  Australia takes regional leadership as does Japan.
China and India will have opinions.

Best,

Adam



On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> The APRALO Beijing Events Organizing Committee seeks your input on possible topics for a Multistakeholder Policy Roundtable in conjunction with the April 2013 ICANN Meeting in Beijing.
>
> The criteria for the policy topics are as follows: (1) highly relevant and important to the region and ICANN; (2) require multistakeholder engagement to address.  For each topic proposed, please provide recommendations on relevant discussion leaders.  These discussion leaders should be knowledgeable about the topic/s and respected regionally or globally.  We would like to have discussion leaders from a broad range of stakeholder groups (i.e., government and inter-governmental, business, non-profit/NGO, and end user).
>
> Possible topics include:
>
> Implications of the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT) for the Internet and the Multistakeholder Model;
> New gTLDs and Implications for the Asia-Pacific and Australasia Region;
> Internationalized Domain Names (IDNs) and Implications for the Asia-Pacific and Australasia Region.
> Please do send us your suggestions and ideas (or your support for any of the above with list of recommended discussion leaders) by Jan 15, 2013.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Best regards,
>
> The APRALO Beijing Events Organizing Committee:
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> APAC-Discuss mailing list
> APAC-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss
>
> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Guadalajara RESOLUTION_101.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 324818 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/apac-discuss/attachments/20130110/b04f1f0d/GuadalajaraRESOLUTION_101.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Guadalajara RESOLUTION_102.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 250459 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/apac-discuss/attachments/20130110/b04f1f0d/GuadalajaraRESOLUTION_102.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Guadalajara RESOLUTION_133.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 268827 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/apac-discuss/attachments/20130110/b04f1f0d/GuadalajaraRESOLUTION_133.pdf>