[APAC-Discuss] Draft Statement on Compliance Issues within ICANN:@

[h.raiche at internode.on.net]

iPads are frustrating - I had drafted a long reply which has now disappeared. 
 
So here goes 
 
fIrst, I share many of garth's concerns about I accuracy and the failure of compliance to act, for all the reasons of safety, security and consumer protection that  
are listed. 
 
That said, I cannot support this statement.  For a start, wedo not have p.roof of why staff were dismissed and without it, what is said is almost defamatory.  
 
Next, we do not need to list instances of when inaccuracies were pointed out and, as far as, we know, action was not taken. It is enough to say that we are aware  
of instances when proven inaccuracies in Whois were drawn to compliance' attention with no apparent response. 
 
Finally, we should note that proposed changes to the RAA and related documents will place far greater responsibility for Whois accuracy on registrars, and we  
would expect that it will be accompanied by firmer action by compliance in future to ensure the accuracy of Whois data. 
 
As I have said, while I am a strong supporter of Whois accuracy and the role compliance should have been playing, I do not support this statement, as currently  
drafted, being made on behalfl of, alac or APRALO 
 
Holly 
> I would like to encourage the ALSes to support the statement and to 
> endorse putting it forward to the ALAC. 
>  
> Kind Regards, 
> Sala 
>  
> Sent from my iPad 
>  
> >  
> >  
> >  
> >  
>  
> _______________________________________________ 
> APAC-Discuss mailing list 
> APAC-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org 
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/apac-discuss [1] 
>  
> Homepage for the region: http://www.apralo.org [2] 
>  
>  
>  
> Links: 
> ------ 
> [1] 
> http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fatlarg 
> e-lists.icann.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fapac-discuss[2] 
> http://webmail-old.internode.on.net/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.apr 
> alo.org 
>