[ALAC] [ccnso-idnpdpwg1] Agenda today's call

[Sivasubramanian Muthusamy]

Hello Patrick Falstrom

Thank you for your response to this message and for your positive
comments which are very encouraging. I feel that this can still be
considered for the Seoul schedule.

Thank you
Sivasubramanian Muthusamy



2009/8/31 Patrik Fältström <patrik at frobbit.se>:
>
> On 31 aug 2009, at 16.59, Sivasubramanian Muthusamy wrote:
>
>> The suggestion is to have inter-constituency meetings during Seoul where
>> ccNSO, GNSO and its commercial and non-commercial constituencies, GAC, ALAC,
>> SSAC as also Board Representatives, Staff designated for IDNs, finance and
>> administration committees, IETF, external advisory / support groups, IDN
>> user groups otherwise not part of the ICANN organization and invited experts
>> could all gather together in one room on a suitable day during the Seoul
>> Meeting to discuss all pending issues related to IDN implementation. The
>> purpose is to bring together view points from the different constituencies /
>> support organizations / experts to reconcile the most important issues that
>> could consume time if discussed in different rooms.
>
> FWIW, I think this is a good idea, and it will in general move ICANN one
> step forward regarding multistakeholder participation. Reason for this is
> that there is some view out there that ICANN Constituencies stop working
> when each one of them have reached a consensus -- the rest of the consensus
> building (across constituences) are left as an exercise for ICANN staff and
> of course the Board.
>
> So I strongly support this initiative. Not only for IDN discussions but in
> general for ICANN. I think there should be a broader consensus in general
> before decisions are made. Call me conservative, but we play with dangerous
> goods here (the global DNS system).
>
>   Regards, Patrik [that for many unfortunate reasons called in 40 min late,
> but did not hear anyone, so that was too late]
>
>
>