[ALAC] Proposed GNSO Council motion regarding user involvement in the GNSO.
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Thu Jan 22 22:18:25 EST 2009
This is a proposed motion to be discussed at the
GNSO meeting next Thursday. Alan
>Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:23:36 -0500
>From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes at verisign.com>
>Subject: [council]
>To: GNSO Council <council at gnso.icann.org>
>
>My apologies for being several hours late, but I
>would like to make the motion that is attached
>and copied below for consideration at our 29 Jan
>meeting. A second is welcome as are friendly amendments.
>
>Chuck
>
>GNSO Restructure Motion re. Individual Users in the GNSO
>
>Whereas:
> * On 11 December 2008, the ICANN Board
> approved Resolution 2008-12-11-02 seeking a
> recommendation on how to incorporate the
> legitimate interests of individual Internet
> users in the GNSO in constructive yet
> non-duplicative ways and requesting that the
> recommendation should be submitted no later
> than 24 January 2009 for consideration by the Board.
> * In an email message to the GNSO Council
> list dated 20 January 2009, the ICANN Vice
> President, Policy Development clarified that
> the11 December Resolution is an effort to help
> the Board identify a strategic solution that
> balances ALAC/At-Large and GNSO opportunities
> for all user and registrant stakeholders.
> * The Working Group on GNSO Council
> Restructuring Report sent to the ICANN Board of
> Directors on 25 July 2008 recommended that the
> Non-Contracted Party/User House would be open
> to membership of all interested parties that
> use or provide services for the Internet, with
> the obvious exclusion of the contracted parties
> and should explicitly not be restricted to
> domain registrants as recommended by the BGC
> and that such recommendation was made in
> response to the suggestion of the ALAC Liaison to the Council.
> * The GNSO Council Chair previously
> contacted the ALAC Chair and the GNSO ALAC Liaison to discuss this topic.
> * The potential members of the two GNSO
> Council Non-Contracted Party Stakeholder Groups
> have been tasked with submitting proposed
> Stakeholder Group Charters to the ICANN Board
> prior to the Board meeting on 6 March 2009.
>Resolve:
> * The Council requests the GNSO Council ALAC
> Liaison in consultation with the ALAC Chair to:
> * Determine whether the ALAC and
> At-Large community have any concerns with
> regard to the recommendation that membership in
> the Non-Contracted Party/User House would be
> open to individual Internet users in addition
> to domain name registrants and, if so, to
> communicate those concerns to the GNSO Council as soon as practical
> * Determine whether the ALAC and
> At-Large community would like the GNSO to
> identify some noncommercial user
> representatives, especially individual users,
> who would be willing to work with the ALAC and
> At-Large community to develop a recommendation
> regarding the Boards request that could be
> forwarded to the NCUC for their consideration
> in developing a stakeholder group charter and
> to the Board for action on GNSO improvement recommendations.
> * Provide weekly progress reports to the
> Council list regarding the above.
> * The Council directs the Council Chair to:
> * Apologize to the Board that it failed
> to meet the Board established deadline of 24 January
> * Inform the Board that the GNSO:
> * Is awaiting information from the ALAC.
> * Is willing in cooperation with
> noncommercial users to identify noncommercial
> user representatives, especially individual
> users, who would be willing to work with the
> ALAC and At-Large community to develop a recommendation.
> * Will promptly consider next steps
> and respond to the Board as quickly as possible
> after requested information is received from
> the ALAC as well any recommendation that may be
> developed by the ALAC and At-Large community.
More information about the ALAC
mailing list