[ALAC] Comments on ALAC review: Relationship with other ICANN entities

[Nguyen Thu Hue]

I agreed with Jacqueline with further points

1. ALAC, RALOS MUST create innovative mechanism to facilitate more ALS-
should be efficient outreach, bottom up approaches to allow any interested
individual to be part of the process. 
2. this is more practical to organise individuals as far as policy voice is
concerned. 

Thu Hue 

-----Original Message-----
From: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jacqueline A.
Morris
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 11:04 PM
To: Izumi AIZU
Cc: At-Large Worldwide
Subject: Re: [ALAC] Comments on ALAC review: Relationship with other ICANN
entities

I agree except for one little distinction:
ALAC to be the ONLY channel for "individual internet users" as defined 
as in their individual life, with other channels for individals in their 
other roles
So I as an academic could belong to both AtLarge and NCUC in 2 different 
roles.

I agree that RALOS MUST create a mechanism to allow individuals to 
participate without forcing them to join an ALS - the concern is with 
capture, but policy voice is what is important, and we are intelligent 
ppl so we can work out a mechanism, I am sure.

Jacqueline
Izumi AIZU wrote:
> I still prefer Option 2, allowing multiple channels, while, ALAC
> can still remain as a major channel for indivdual Internet users
> to ICANN process.
>
> As for the definition or distinction, first of all we should stick with
> the word "individual Internet users", not just "users" or "end-users".
> That is inline with what Jacquline wrote. To me, "individual Internet
> user" mean those users who are using the Internet for himself or
> herself, but not for the organization or group he or she is enaged.
> Still not clear, I know.... but that the sort of dillemma we all are
> facing.
>
> I also like to see some additional mechanism to allow individuals
> participate in AtLarge activities in substantial manner without
> belonging to any ALS, let alone RALO. That does not mean
> that person will get voting right for ArLarge related elections,
> but voices for policy issues.
>
> izumi
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
>   


_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac