[ALAC] Comments on ALAC review: Relationship with other ICANN entities

[Patrick Vande Walle]

Izumi,

I may be wrong on this, but it is my impression that the at-large list
and at-large wg lists are open to anyone interested, not just ALSes

Patrick


Izumi AIZU wrote, On 3/11/08 17:59:
> I still prefer Option 2, allowing multiple channels, while, ALAC
> can still remain as a major channel for indivdual Internet users
> to ICANN process.
> 
> As for the definition or distinction, first of all we should stick with
> the word "individual Internet users", not just "users" or "end-users".
> That is inline with what Jacquline wrote. To me, "individual Internet
> user" mean those users who are using the Internet for himself or
> herself, but not for the organization or group he or she is enaged.
> Still not clear, I know.... but that the sort of dillemma we all are
> facing.
> 
> I also like to see some additional mechanism to allow individuals
> participate in AtLarge activities in substantial manner without
> belonging to any ALS, let alone RALO. That does not mean
> that person will get voting right for ArLarge related elections,
> but voices for policy issues.
> 
> izumi
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> 
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
> 

-- 
Patrick Vande Walle
Check my blog: http://patrick.vande-walle.eu