[ALAC] Comments on ALAC review: Relationship with other ICANN entities

[Izumi AIZU]

I still prefer Option 2, allowing multiple channels, while, ALAC
can still remain as a major channel for indivdual Internet users
to ICANN process.

As for the definition or distinction, first of all we should stick with
the word "individual Internet users", not just "users" or "end-users".
That is inline with what Jacquline wrote. To me, "individual Internet
user" mean those users who are using the Internet for himself or
herself, but not for the organization or group he or she is enaged.
Still not clear, I know.... but that the sort of dillemma we all are
facing.

I also like to see some additional mechanism to allow individuals
participate in AtLarge activities in substantial manner without
belonging to any ALS, let alone RALO. That does not mean
that person will get voting right for ArLarge related elections,
but voices for policy issues.

izumi