[ALAC] Mailing list duplication

[Thompson, Darlene]

Well, and now after my last e-mail, I'm disagreeing with myself.  We
have ALAC Announce for announcements.  So what is the difference between
ALAC and At-Large?  No idea whatsoever.  Dang!

D

Darlene A. Thompson
Community Access Program Administrator
Nunavut Dept. of Education / N-CAP
P.O. Box 1000, Station 910
Iqaluit, NU  X0A 0H0
Phone:  (867) 975-5631
Fax:  (867) 975-5610
E-mail:  dthompson at gov.nu.ca
 

-----Original Message-----
From: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan
Greenberg
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2008 3:46 PM
To: alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org
Subject: Re: [ALAC] Mailing list duplication

You may well be right regarding Internet policy issues in general. 
But there will certainly be internal communications for 
administrative issues, or ongoing work on a statement being 
formulated or discussed that is targeted to a specific RALO).

And we need to remember that if a subscriber is flooded with mail 
that has no direct relevance to them, they may well just get off the 
list. So targeting is important.

Alan

At 07/08/2008 03:27 PM, Carlton Samuels wrote:
>Based on our mandate, I cannot think of any issue important to ALAC
that
>would have a specificity of interest to just one RALO.
>
>This is not to say that every issue will resonate the same for every
>ALS.......or even RALO!
>
>Carlton
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>[mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Alan
Greenberg
>Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 12:44 PM
>To: alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>Subject: [ALAC] Mailing list duplication
>
>The ALAC and (presumably) the ALAC-Internal list includes the ALAC,
>RALO management and ICANN staff.
>
>The At-Large list is a self-selected list of people which (at the
>moment) includes all ALAC members, but not not several of the RALO
people.
>
>The RALO lists include an unknown subset/superset of these same people.
>
>Somehow we need to rationalize this.
>
>Some questions that come to mind are:
>- Where do we want substantive discussions with users to take place.
>- Are ALAC and RALO people obliged to read the At-Large list and
>comment when appropriate.
>- Should the RALO lists be identified as being exclusively for issues
>that are relevant to that RALO only?
>
>Are there more question that we need to consider.? Are there any
>reasonable answers which will allow interaction with people outside
>of this lists's members, but will avoid needless cross posting?
>
>Alan
>
>PS The issue came up in my mind because I am about to post a message
>on the RAA and see no way to hit a reasonable cross-section of people
>without cross-posting.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.ican
n.org
>
>At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac



_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann
.org

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac