<div dir="auto">Totally agree. It's a team effort. Power to the people!!<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">M</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, 3:13 PM Greg Shatan, <<a href="mailto:greg@isoc-ny.org">greg@isoc-ny.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Maureen and all,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I agree with Roberto, and would perhaps go even further.  The best solution would be to have a voting seat on the PIR board, rather than a non-voting liaison.  I'm not sure which Roberto was suggesting. To my mind, true "representation" comes with a vote..</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">I also agree with everything Jonathan Zuck said -- about the mission, about Malthouse, about that "editorial." Nasty stuff.  An appropriate response needs to be considered, but I'm not sure what that might be.  It might be a message from someone else in At Large, pointing out that in a bottom-up organization, it's not the Chair's job to go flying into battle on their own impetus.  Or maybe it can come from a bunch of somebodies....</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">However, I'm concerned that if ALAC and At-large do not speak for themselves, the "record" is going to be the garbage that is being thrown at us.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">There are more important things than a pissing match in the toilet of public opinion.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">We have ALAC's "superpower" -- the mandate to provide formal advice to the Board.  (Not quite as "super" as GAC advice, but it's what we've got, and if it is exercised properly, it will grow in strength, like a muscle.)</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Then we can go into toilets with Jacob and Nat....</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif">Greg</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:verdana,sans-serif"><br></div><div><div dir="ltr" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><font face="trebuchet ms, sans-serif">Greg Shatan</font><div><a href="mailto:greg@isoc-ny.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"><font face="trebuchet ms, sans-serif">greg@isoc-ny.org</font></a></div><div><font face="trebuchet ms, sans-serif">President, ISOC-NY</font></div><div><font face="trebuchet ms, sans-serif"><i>"The Internet is for everyone"</i></font></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 2:10 PM Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <<a href="mailto:ocl@gih.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">ocl@gih.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div>
    Dear all,<br>
    <br>
    indeed - the DotMobi Liaison was on the DotMobi Policy Advisory
    Board. But IMHO Roberto's suggestion for a Liaison to the PIR Board
    sounds good.<br>
    For those interested, DotMobi Liaison Reports can be found on:
    <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/dotMOBI+Liaison+Reports" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/dotMOBI+Liaison+Reports</a><br>
    <br>
    Kindest regards,<br>
    <br>
    Olivier<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div>On 06/01/2020 11:24, Maureen Hilyard
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <div dir="ltr">Excellent points Roberto.
        <div>Your experience on the PIR Board is invaluable in this
          regard. and your recommendations noted.</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Maureen</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 12:02
          AM Roberto Gaetano <<a href="mailto:mail.roberto.gaetano@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">mail.roberto.gaetano@gmail.com</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div>Hi Maureen.
            <div>I have been thinking further about this, and came to
              the conclusion that our proposal would be not to have a
              representative on the Stewardship Council but on the PIR
              Board.</div>
            <div>Here is the rationale for that.</div>
            <div>The Stewardship Council will play the role that was
              previously of the Advisory Council. Its purpose was to get
              multiple voices from different part of the user community,
              and in particular the NGOs, ensuring diversity of
              opinions. This body was advisory to a Board that had
              already built-in the fundamental non-profit,
              user-community DNA, because it was selected by ISOC.</div>
            <div>With the changed situation, we can safely assume that
              the new PIR Board will be selected by Ethos to take care
              of the interests of the investors, and there is no
              guarantee that the public interest is being taken care of.</div>
            <div>This will be a good option for Ethos as well, because
              it would show in a concrete way the commitment to the
              public interest beyond mere verbal expression of intents.
              On the other hand, Ethos and the investors would keep a
              solid majority that will ensure that their interests are
              protected.</div>
            <div>We should remember that while the Advisory Council was
              surely empowered to provide advice, and was surely
              listened to, a Director would have access to more
              information and definitively better opportunities to
              discuss different ideas and approaches with his/her fellow
              Directors, therefore presenting the point of view of the
              public interest more effectively.</div>
            <div>In short, this person wold play a role that is similar
              to the one that León plays in ICANN: committed to the
              fiduciary responsibility to the corporation but able to be
              a strong voice to the discussion.</div>
            <div>I think that we should not be shy, all in remaining
              reasonable with our proposals. I believe that this one is
              a win-win, bringing the voice of the user community in PIR
              and being a good opportunity for Ethos to show a
              commitment while still remaining in control of PIR.</div>
            <div>Cheers,</div>
            <div>Roberto</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>PS: As I am not subscribed to the different mailing
              lists, please forward this if you see fit</div>
            <div><br>
              <div><br>
                <blockquote type="cite">
                  <div>On 06.01.2020, at 01:40, Maureen Hilyard <<a href="mailto:maureen.hilyard@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">maureen.hilyard@gmail.com</a>>
                    wrote:</div>
                  <br>
                  <div>
                    <div dir="ltr"> <a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/20200105_hilyard_has_a_historic_chance_to_activate_icann_at_large/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">http://www.circleid.com/posts/20200105_hilyard_has_a_historic_chance_to_activate_icann_at_large/</a><br>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>Well that is certainly forcing our hand to
                        take some action. But with arrows flying in all
                        sorts of directions it has been difficult to
                        know which one to follow, and I note there has
                        been a break in the conversations on this topic.</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>Interesting and very timely that Roberto
                        raised the .org issue again in an earlier email
                        today. I started a response until JZ reminded us
                        that the thread was about .com </div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>I agree with Roberto's approach  - that we
                        should focus on our role as the voice of
                        At-Large end-users and offer some creative
                        advice on how we might influence the behaviour
                        of PIR and any future decisions they make that
                        will impact on .org end-users. PIR/Ethos already
                        presented a webinar and said all the right
                        things.. but how can we be assured that they
                        will stick to what they said that they would do
                        in the future? Who will monitor this on behalf
                        of ordinary end-users? Who will be represented
                        on the Stewardship Council?</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>At the same time we may also need to advise
                        the ICANN Board about how they might deal with
                        the ICANN-PIR/Ethos contract - especially
                        Roberto's recommendation of <span>some </span><span>commitment
                          from ICANN that ethical behaviour towards .org
                          end-users will be built into it.</span></div>
                      <div><span><br>
                        </span></div>
                      <div>We are aware that the Board is looking into
                        every legal issue relating to how they can deal
                        with matters that are being raised by letters
                        that are flowing their way. We don't need to add
                        more of the same.</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>While i think it might be seen to be a
                        simplistic approach, I believe that we should
                        stick to what our job is and focus on advice to
                        the Board and to PIR- but lets try to be
                        creative about how we advise them, looking at
                        the impacts on end-users from all perspectives.</div>
                      <div><br>
                      </div>
                      <div>My 2c</div>
                      <div>M<br>
                      </div>
                      <div><span><br>
                        </span></div>
                      <div>
                        <ul>
                          <li style="margin-left:15px"><br>
                          </li>
                        </ul>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    _______________________________________________<br>
                    CPWG mailing list<br>
                    <a href="mailto:CPWG@icann.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">CPWG@icann.org</a><br>
                    <a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg</a><br>
                    <br>
                    _______________________________________________<br>
                    By submitting your personal data, you consent to the
                    processing of your personal data for purposes of
                    subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the
                    ICANN Privacy Policy (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>)
                    and the website Terms of Service (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>).
                    You can visit the Mailman link above to change your
                    membership status or configuration, including
                    unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
                    disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a
                    vacation), and so on.</div>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
              <br>
            </div>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <pre>_______________________________________________
ALT-Plus mailing list
<a href="mailto:ALT-Plus@icann.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">ALT-Plus@icann.org</a>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alt-plus" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alt-plus</a>

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>) and the website Terms of Service (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <pre cols="72">-- 
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
<a href="http://www.gih.com/ocl.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">http://www.gih.com/ocl.html</a></pre>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br>
CPWG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:CPWG@icann.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">CPWG@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>) and the website Terms of Service (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>