<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<title></title>
</head>
<body style="font-family:Arial;font-size:14px">
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">Justine,</span></p>
<p class="p2"> </p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">I agree with your revised list and the explanation you gave.</span></p>
<p class="p2"> </p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1">Tijani</span></p>
<p class="p1"><span class="s1"> </span></p>
<p class="p3"><span class="s1">Le 8 mai 2019 à 04:05, Justine Chew <<a href="mailto:justine.chew.icann@gmail.com"><span class="s2">justine.chew.icann@gmail.com</span></a>> a écrit :</span></p>
<p class="p4"><span class="s3">Keith's proposal had been added to <a href="https://icann.wufoo.com/reports/icann65-proposed-topics"><span class="s2">https://icann.wufoo.com/reports/icann65-proposed-topics</span></a> </span></p>
<p class="p5"> </p>
<p class="p3"><span class="s1">Off the back of my earlier feedback through the CPWG mail list (which incidentally didn't get through this mail list) where I also thought it would be sensible to group certain topics together. I had:</span></p>
<ol class="ol1">
<li class="li3"><span class="s1">WHOIS accuracy, GDPR, EPDP2, Unified Access Model</span></li>
<li class="li3"><span class="s1">SSR2, ATRT3, NomCom Review Implementation</span></li>
<li class="li3"><span class="s1">Effectiveness of Specific Review recommendations and implementation </span></li>
<li class="li3"><span class="s1">UA</span></li>
<li class="li3"><span class="s1">Privacy and Proxy Implementation (I chose to keep this separated from group 1 because of its in-limbo status)</span></li>
<li class="li3"><span class="s1">DoH</span></li>
<li class="li3"><span class="s1">Future of Multistakeholder Model of Governance</span></li>
</ol>
<div class="li3"><span style="color:#663399;"><span class="s1"><span style="background-color:#ffffff;">And revising my list of priorities for HIT vs At-Large at Marrakech:</span></span></span></div>
<ul class="ul1">
<li class="li3"><span class="s1">7. Future of Multistakeholder Model of Governance --- both HIT & At-Large priority, coming off the recently published call for comments (for talking points)</span></li>
<li class="li3"><span class="s1">3. Effectiveness of Specific Review recommendations and implementation --- both HIT & At-Large priority, especially insofar as recourse for the CCTRT report is concerned</span></li>
<li class="li3"><span class="s1">4. UA -- HIT for considering approach to community / consensus policy (certainly At-Large talking points as a follow on from Kobe meeting)</span></li>
<li class="li3"><span class="s1">6. DoH -- At-Large priority for understanding & considering implications to end-users (if not HIT as well) </span></li>
</ul>
<p class="p5"> </p>
<p class="p3"><span class="s1">IMO, groups 1 and 2 are at this point better suited as updates rather than for HIT sessions -- let the various WGs/EPDP/RTs carry on with their work.</span></p>
<p class="p5"> </p>
<p class="p3"><span class="s1">Same goes for the other GNSO topics which Keith raised where they don't already appear in the above list of 7.</span></p>
<p class="p5"> </p>
<p class="p3"><span class="s1">J</span></p>
<p><br></p>
</body>
</html>