<html>
<body>
At 15/10/2018 04:55 PM, Judith Hellerstein wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Content-Type: text/html;
charset=windows-1252<br>
Content-Language: en-US<br>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit<br><br>
HI Alan,<br><br>
Some additional comments and additions to the ALAC RoP. Otherwise I
think it reads much better and thanks for making the changes. I
will send a separate email about changes to the email guide. <br>
<br>
1) I would like to add an additional sub paragraph to section B Paragraph
4 to say<br><br>
Prepare for and actively participate in all RALO discussions and provide
the ALAC perspective and updates on ALAC decisions or pending decisions,
including face-to-face meetings, teleconferences, e-mail lists, wikis and
other means of interaction.</blockquote><br>
If this were to be added, it should come from the At-Large Improvements
and Metrics groups. Moreover, at the moment, a NomCom appointed
ALAC member has no formal obligation to participate in the RALO
activities. In my mind they certainly should, but it is not clear that we
can require it.<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">2) Paragraph 5----5.2 I
think we need to change this to say that the person being nominated as
Chair **needs** to be an ALAC Member at the time of nomination but must
have an expectation of being an ALAC Member after the next ALAC Annual
General Meeting (AAGM), the ALAC meeting held in conjunction with the
ICANN Annual General Meeting (AGM).<br><br>
If you recall, we waited until the elections were complete to do the
nominations and since we are doing that and always plan to do that I
think we should say so in our rules</blockquote><br>
That was explicitly not the intent of this rule and if we were to change
it, it would require discussion above what is intended in this
cleanup.<br><br>
At the moment, it is full allowed for a new incoming ALAC Member to be
selected as Chair, something that would not be allowed if we make the
change you are suggesting.<br><br>
We waited until the elections were complete for just the reason I stated,
to allow someone to be identified who is not currently on the ALAC but
would be after the AGM.<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">3) 9.2 I would like to add
one thing<br><br>
9.2.3.4 Participation in RALO Discussions and briefings</blockquote><br>
I think you mean 9.2.4, but as above, this is a substantive issue and not
a minor clarification.<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">4) C.
11.9.1.13<br><br>
Add the words short summaries of each item on the agenda
</blockquote><br><br>
Do you mean 11.9.1.7?? ie another item to be added to records of
meetings??<br><br>
If so, I agree that it would be a good thing, but it is not something we
do now and when it has been suggested, we have been told that we do not
have the staff resources to so this. So I think it needs to come out of
the staff support section of the Review Implementation.<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">5) 18.1. I
think we need to name the ALAC selection committee here in this document
and also have a few lines on how they are chosen. The same as we do for
the Board Member Selection Process Committee and the Board Candidate
Evaluation Committee</blockquote><br>
We do not go into other sub-committees of the ALAC in the RoP (other than
for the Board member selection), and if we are going to do that, It would
be done across the board. Moreover, the current SC operates based on a
decision of the ALAC. If we were going to cast it in stone (so to speak),
I think that we need a substantive discussion on it. Certainly nothing
that I would recommend doing just before a new Chair takes office - just
the time when there may be changes.<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">6) 19.11.3 Dis you
mean 3 or more </blockquote><br>
19.11.3 is only for when there are more than three candidates. 19.11.4
address 3 candidates.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Cheers,<br><br>
Judith<br><br>
<pre>
_________________________________________________________________________
Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
Hellerstein & Associates
3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
Phone: (202) 362-5139 Skype ID: judithhellerstein
Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517
E-mail:
<a href="mailto:Judith@jhellerstein.com">Judith@jhellerstein.com</a>
Website:
<a href="http://www.jhellerstein.com">www.jhellerstein.com</a>
Linked In:
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/">
www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/</a>
Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide
</pre><br>
On 10/14/2018 5:59 PM, Alan Greenberg
wrote:<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Please find attached the
RoP and E-mail Guide addressing the issues that have been raised. Both
marked up and clean versions are included. In the marked up versions, the
original changes are in <font color="#FF0000">red</font> and the new
changes as a result of comments are in<font color="#0000FF">
blue</font>.<br><br>
The full set of current documents can be found at
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Rules+of+Procedure" eudora="autourl">
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/Rules+of+Procedure</a>.<br>
<br>
These revisions will be discussed in Barcelona on Sunday and presuming we
come to closure, will be voted on during the Wrap Up meeting.<br><br>
If you have any concerns with this new version, please raise them via
e-mail prior to the meetings to ensure that they can be properly dealt
with.<br><br>
There were two issues that were raised during the discussion that are
explicitly not included here.<br><br>
1. Rules related to the certification of ALSes and the admittance of
individual unaffiliated members. These issues will be discussed during
the At-Large Review Implementation or in other fora and no changes in
respect to this are included here.<br><br>
2. Whether the BCEC slate of Board candidates should be final or whether
as under the current rules, RALOs should be able to add candidates
(subject to specific ruls and processes). There seems to be a growing
feeling in the ALAC that the petition process is not needed. No change is
included here other than to clarify the petition process. The change
would be easy to implement should the ALAC desire.<br><br>
Alan <br><br>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
<a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org">
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" eudora="autourl">
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a>
At-Large Online:
<a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a>
ALAC Working Wiki:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)">
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a>
</pre></blockquote><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ALAC mailing list<br>
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org<br>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" eudora="autourl">
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br><br>
At-Large Online:
<a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org/" eudora="autourl">
http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
ALAC Working Wiki:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC" eudora="autourl">
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC</a>
)</blockquote></body>
</html>