<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
Dear Seun, Alan,<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/10/2018 14:11, Seun Ojedeji
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAD_dc6gkk3WQ+Sco_fi+RSLOZiErQv4h0+KEzDaN_wmD4N8yOw@mail.gmail.com">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="m_-2982709696943538097cite">19.9.1
- Edits suggests that all
RALO must agree that BCEC erred, was that the intention? I
think that may
be very difficult to achieve especially in a highly tense
political
setup.(am not saying we have that now, but the RoP is to be
future
proof)</blockquote>
<br>
The intent is that for a person to be added to the ballot,
three RALOs
must each feel strongly that the BCEC erred. The BCEC is made
up of
people selected by the RALOs and in the view of the group that
agreed on
this process, it should be a high bar to tell the BCEC that it
erred. If
we do not as a matter of course, trust the BCEC to do its
deliberations
carefully, why do we bother with the process at all? <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>SO: I was one of the last BSMPC or is it BCEC and remember
that recommendation and i agree with 3 RALOs, but the current
wording suggests all RALOs must have to support the petition
from a particular RALO. </div>
</blockquote>
<br>
The number of supporting RALOs is given in 19.9.3 but I agree that
there is some potential for ambiguity/confusion in 19.9.1.<br>
May I suggest:<br>
19.9.1 Following the publication of the BCEC slate of candidates,
RALOs have an opportunity to suggest adding candidates to that list
if RALOs believe that the BCEC <font color="#ff0000">did not make a
good decision </font>in omitting a candidate. The timetable
should allow for consultations within a RALO, and outreach between
RALOs so that those RALOs may consider, using whatever methodology
they choose, whether they have a similar interest in the additional
candidate<font color="#ff0000">(s)</font>.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
<br>
Olivier<br>
</body>
</html>