<html>
<body>
Marita, I am not sure that your synopsis is all that different from
endorsing the entire paper when you start examining the rationales, but I
would be happy to accept that if we can get closure on it quickly. Time
is our enemy in this overall EPDP process.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
<br>
At 28/08/2018 10:38 AM, Marita Moll wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<font face="Times New Roman, Times">Sorry to have missed the call --
still confusing midnight Monday with midnight Tuesday -- I guess I will
get used to the format.<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times">I just read this really well done
SSAC report which is clear and thorough. But there is a lot in there. I
wonder if we should do a blanket endorsement of everything without
careful analysis. <br>
</font><br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times">Could we not have a more nuanced
position? For example, we could say that, in line with our mandate to
support end-users, we support SSAC's position on ensuring that security
professionals and law enforcement have adequate access to WHOIS/RDS data.
<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times">If that is the point we want to
make.<br>
</font><br>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times">Marita</font><br><br>
On 8/28/2018 2:23 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">As I mentioned on the ALAC call
that has just completed, all EPDP participant groups have been given the
opportunity to provide "early input" into the EPDP. <br><br>
So far, the SSAC and the NCSG has done so. Their input can be found at
<a href="https://community.icann.org/x/Ag9pBQ">
https://community.icann.org/x/Ag9pBQ</a>.<br><br>
The SSAC's input consisted of their recent report SAC101. A copy is
attached for your convenience.<br><br>
I would like to suggest that the ALAC submit a statement saying that we
support SAC101, as it is in line with our stated position of trying to
ensure that security professionals and law enforcement have adequate
access to WHOIS/RDS data.<br><br>
I open the floor for discussion and will initiate a Consensus Call later
in the week.<br><br>
Alan <br><br>
<br>
<pre>_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
<a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org">
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" eudora="autourl">
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a>
At-Large Online:
<a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a>
ALAC Working Wiki:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)">
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a>
</pre></blockquote><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ALAC mailing list<br>
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org<br>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" eudora="autourl">
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br><br>
At-Large Online:
<a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org/" eudora="autourl">
http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
ALAC Working Wiki:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC" eudora="autourl">
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC</a>
)</blockquote></body>
</html>