<html>
<body>
I note that the letter referenced was providing guidance to the GNSO
Council in drafting the Charter and specifically the scope of the EPDP.
The SSAC sent the full SAC101 to the EPDP as "early input". It
omits the parts of SAC101 not relevant to setting scope.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
At 28/08/2018 07:16 PM, Carlton Samuels wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">The At-Large is well-advised to
take SSAC publications seriously. For in regard to problem definition,
analysis and recommendations to solution they are thorough, devoid of
hysteria and exhibits an internal logic any sentient being can
apply.<br><br>
A suggestion.
<a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ssac2018-17-26jun18-en.pdf">
SAC2018-17</a> details the high-level recommendations as principles that
the SSAC believes should guide ePDP deliberations. The SSAC say these
recommendations are extracted from the SAC101 Advisory; in their own
words, "<i>several of the recommendations are specifically designed
as inputs to the ePDP</i>" then in construction and particularized
further in SAC2018-17. <br><br>
I have read SAC101 publication and on balance of fact, so affirm.
If you recall, this is the kind of approach some of us advised the ALAC
should embrace to guide participation of At-Large representatives on the
ePDP. One cannot now say that such a document - meaning an At-Large
developed and ALAC-endorsed document - emerged from that lot of
interventions. <br><br>
What I can say is the SSAC-enunciated principles look very much
like those the rational mind of an At-Large participant would support. I
would urge you reject this malignant At-Large propensity to re-invent the
wheel. Endorse the principles as outlined in SAC2018-17 and save
yourselves a bother without a redeemable quality.<br><br>
-Carlton <br><br>
==============================<br>
<font face="comic sans ms"><i>Carlton A Samuels</i></font><br>
<font face="comic sans ms"><i>Mobile: 876-818-1799<br>
</font><font face="comic sans ms" color="#33CC00">Strategy, Process,
Governance, Assessment & Turnaround</i></font><br>
=============================<br><br>
<br>
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 9:39 AM Marita Moll
<<a href="mailto:mmoll@ca.inter.net">mmoll@ca.inter.net</a>>
wrote:
<dl>
<dd><font face="Times New Roman, Times">Sorry to have missed the call --
still confusing midnight Monday with midnight Tuesday -- I guess I will
get used to the format.</font>
<dd><font face="Times New Roman, Times">I just read this really well done
SSAC report which is clear and thorough. But there is a lot in there. I
wonder if we should do a blanket endorsement of everything without
careful analysis. </font>
<dd><font face="Times New Roman, Times">Could we not have a more nuanced
position? For example, we could say that, in line with our mandate to
support end-users, we support SSAC's position on ensuring that security
professionals and law enforcement have adequate access to WHOIS/RDS data.
</font>
<dd><font face="Times New Roman, Times">If that is the point we want to
make.</font>
<dd><font face="Times New Roman, Times">Marita</font><br>
<dd>On 8/28/2018 2:23 AM, Alan Greenberg
wrote:<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">
<dd>As I mentioned on the ALAC call that has just completed, all EPDP
participant groups have been given the opportunity to provide "early
input" into the EPDP. <br>
<dd>So far, the SSAC and the NCSG has done so. Their input can be found
at
<a href="https://community.icann.org/x/Ag9pBQ">
https://community.icann.org/x/Ag9pBQ</a>.<br>
<dd>The SSAC's input consisted of their recent report SAC101. A copy is
attached for your convenience.<br>
<dd>I would like to suggest that the ALAC submit a statement saying that
we support SAC101, as it is in line with our stated position of trying to
ensure that security professionals and law enforcement have adequate
access to WHOIS/RDS data.<br><br>
<dd>I open the floor for discussion and will initiate a Consensus Call
later in the week.<br>
<dd>Alan <br>
<br>
<br><br>
<dd><pre>_______________________________________________
<dd>ALAC mailing list
<dd><a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org">
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a>
<dd>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" eudora="autourl">
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a>
<dd>At-Large Online:
<a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a>
<dd>ALAC Working Wiki:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)">
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a>
</pre></blockquote>
<dd>_______________________________________________
<dd>ALAC mailing list
<dd><a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org">
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a>
<dd>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" eudora="autourl">
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br>
<dd>At-Large Online:
<a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a>
<dd>ALAC Working Wiki:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)">
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a>
<br><br>
</dl>_______________________________________________<br>
ALAC mailing list<br>
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org<br>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" eudora="autourl">
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br><br>
At-Large Online:
<a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org/" eudora="autourl">
http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
ALAC Working Wiki:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC" eudora="autourl">
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC</a>
)</blockquote></body>
</html>