<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Thanks Holly, My
        concerns in a nutshell. This document covers a lot of ground
        outside of the particular principle we are currently addressing.</font></p>
    <p><font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Marita</font><br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/28/2018 3:44 PM, Holly Raiche
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:5D5A5074-6AD0-4DDC-80FA-5646C95EFE3B@internode.on.net">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      My further two cents.
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>The SSAC 101 goes into a lot of detail on how access is being
        blocked and in what circumstance.  Some of that text some may
        not support.  So I’d rather support the summary statement that
        Marita proposed - which means support for the principle, but
        without necessarily supporting all of the text.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Holly<br>
        <div>
          <div>On 29 Aug 2018, at 5:35 am, Joanna Kulesza <<a
              href="mailto:jkuleszaicann@gmail.com"
              moz-do-not-send="true">jkuleszaicann@gmail.com</a>>
            wrote:</div>
          <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
          <blockquote type="cite">Thank you Alan, I fully see your
            point. As already said, if the group do decide to go for a
            more nuanced response, I'm happy to help with the drafting.
            Just to briefly respond to Marita's suggestion:  I would
            assume the details of any "adequate access" are bound to
            stir controversy. Yet if the group decide we are for full
            endorsement, I will halt my concerns.<br>
            <br>
            Just my two cents. Thanks!<br>
            J. <br>
            <br>
            W dniu wtorek, 28 sierpnia 2018 Alan Greenberg <<a
              href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca"
              moz-do-not-send="true">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>>
            napisał(a):<br>
            > I can only give you my opinion. I cannot say whether
            our position is identical to that of SSAC, but I cannot see
            anything in that document that I do not believe is in
            support of our needs. I do not think that we have the
            bacndwidth to work from scratch at the moment, and in a
            timely manner. Voicing support for this report was a quick
            action that I believed we could take without compromising
            our position.<br>
            ><br>
            > I would be interested in understanding what we do not
            agree with and we could certainly add those caveats if there
            was agreement.<br>
            ><br>
            > And thank you for jumping in!  :-)<br>
            ><br>
            > Alan<br>
            ><br>
            > At 28/08/2018 05:09 AM, Joanna Kulesza wrote:<br>
            ><br>
            > Thank you Alan and Andrei for the updates.<br>
            ><br>
            > Please excuse my newcomer confusion - not meaning to
            stir the pot here - but I'm wondering how close
            At-Large's/ALAC's position is to that of the SSAC? Do we
            agree with their report 100%? My initial thinking is that
            representing users, we might want a somewhat more
            diversified approach than that offered by the SSAC, ensuring
            full GDPR compliance (I'm happy to elaborate if needed).
            Also, would it make sense to take on the positions of other
            communities in our statement, if only for the sake of future
            consensus building? As already briefly mentioned to Alan,
            I'm happy to help with the drafting if needed.<br>
            ><br>
            > Best to all,<br>
            > Joanna Kulesza<br>
            > --------------------------------<br>
            > Joanna Kulesza, PhD<br>
            > assistant professor of international law and Internet
            governance<br>
            > Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Lodz<br>
            > Kopcinskiego Street 8/12, 90-232 Lodz, Poland<br>
            > publications: <a
              href="https://unilodz.academia.edu/JoannaKulesza/"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://unilodz.academia.edu/JoannaKulesza/</a><br>
            > website: <a
              href="https://pl.linkedin.com/in/kuleszajoanna"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://pl.linkedin.com/in/kuleszajoanna</a><br>
            ><br>
            > wt., 28 sie 2018 o 08:27 Alan Greenberg <<a
              href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca"
              moz-do-not-send="true">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a> >
            napisaÅ‚(a): As I mentioned on the ALAC call that has just
            completed, all EPDP participant groups have been given the
            opportunity to provide "early input" into the EPDP.<br>
            > So far, the SSAC and the NCSG has done so. Their input
            can be found at <a
              href="https://community.icann.org/x/Ag9pBQ"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://community.icann.org/x/Ag9pBQ</a>.<br>
            > The SSAC's input consisted of their recent report
            SAC101. A copy is attached for your convenience.<br>
            > I would like to suggest that the ALAC submit a
            statement saying that we support SAC101, as it is in line
            with our stated position of trying to ensure that security
            professionals and law enforcement have adequate access to
            WHOIS/RDS data.<br>
            > I open the floor for discussion and will initiate a
            Consensus Call later in the week.<br>
            > Alan _______________________________________________
            ALAC mailing list <a
              href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org"
              moz-do-not-send="true">ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a> <a
href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br>
            > At-Large Online: <a
              href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org/"
              moz-do-not-send="true">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a>
            ALAC Working Wiki: <a
href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC%29"
              moz-do-not-send="true">https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a>
            _______________________________________________<br>
            ALAC mailing list<br>
            <a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org"
              moz-do-not-send="true">ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
            <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br>
            <br>
            At-Large Online: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
            ALAC Working Wiki:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)">https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a></blockquote>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org">ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a>

At-Large Online: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a>
ALAC Working Wiki: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)">https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a></pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>