<html>
<body>
To be clear, the 30 hour/week estimate came from the GNSO and I am pretty
sure was presuming the person already has full background
knowledge.<br><br>
It is a heavy demand and we are presuming that few people will be able to
make it.<br><br>
Others can be observers and can contribute through the At-Large gTLD WG
and webinars and conference calls we will be having.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
At 11/07/2018 01:14 PM, Vanda Scartezini wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Olivier<br>
As a member interested in the GDPR and deeply involved in the legislation
here, I would assume that anyone that have read all the GDPR legislation,
the letters exchanged by ICANN with the EDPB, and knowing the WHOIS
demand, time will be much less demanded than these 30 hours, since lots
of this work will be referred to those documents. However, if you
are not so familiar, will experience may be more than those 30 hours, at
least in the beginning of this work. <br>
As I read in all correspondence from ALAN, this call for volunteers is
demanded previous knowledge. The more you know about it, the less the
dedicated time will be for you.<br>
We all are involved in several WG in ICANN itself and our Ralos in
particular and will continue to be involved. Balance the time is on each
one of us.<br>
Certainly, ask for 30 hours a week for volunteers is too much, will only
work if you are full retired and eager to look for something else to
fulfill your free time.<br>
For me this is a quite interesting work because is aligned with I am done
here (next Monday will record a podcast about GDPR and local legislation
and will certainly refer to WHOIS).<br>
Besides the chair/ co-chairs, other members with a previous knowledge
will be able to manage the time expended.<br>
kisses<br>
<br>
<b><i>Vanda Scartezini<br>
Polo Consultores Associados<br>
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004<br>
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil<br>
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253<br>
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <br>
Sorry for any typos. <br>
</i></b> <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<b>From: </b>ALAC <alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf
of Olivier Crepin-Leblond <ocl@gih.com><br>
<b>Date: </b>Wednesday, July 11, 2018 at 10:37<br>
<b>To: </b>'ALAC List' <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [ALAC] Call for Volunteers: GNSO Expedited PDP on
Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data<br>
<br>
Dear Alan,<br><br>
I am reading your call for candidates for the EPDP and one thing (in
particular) has raised my attention:<br>
On 11/07/2018 01:50, Alan Greenberg wrote:<br>
<dl>
<dd>Membership in the EPDP is expected to require up to 30 hours per
week, starting immediately and at least for the first 4 months, and
probably a lower but still significant commitment until mid-2018. The
GNSO is also setting some very specific criteria for participation.
Although the list may change, the current requirements are as follows:
<br>
</u></b><br>
</dl><br>
When we asked about this "up to 30 hours per week" and wondered
whether this was reasonable for a volunteer, we were told that this
doesn't mean 30 hours of calls per week, but the total number of hours
including document reading and drafting could be 30 hours per
week.<br><br>
I still wonder whether this is reasonable to ask from a volunteer. Could
these 30 hours per week be pooled?<br><br>
Kindest regards,<br><br>
Olivier<br><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
ALAC mailing list<br>
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org<br>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" eudora="autourl">
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br><br>
At-Large Online:
<a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org/" eudora="autourl">
http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
ALAC Working Wiki:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC" eudora="autourl">
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC</a>
)</blockquote></body>
</html>