<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:black;}
span.EstiloCorreo18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body bgcolor=white lang=ES-AR link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:windowtext;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>I think that the internet should be left open. It is true that generates discussion. Like "Public interest" we are not clear about the definition, but we do many things in the public interest without having that definition.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:windowtext;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>We can continue discussing the definition of both concepts, and continue working ...<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:windowtext;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Goran himself in a meeting said something similar to this, although I do not remember what concept: if you ask me the definition, I do not have it, but we are doing many things even without the definition.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:windowtext;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:windowtext;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:windowtext;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:windowtext;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'>Alberto<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='color:windowtext;mso-fareast-language:EN-US'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=ES style='color:windowtext'>De:</span></b><span lang=ES style='color:windowtext'> ALAC <alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org> <b>En nombre de </b>Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond<br><b>Enviado el:</b> martes, 08 de mayo de 2018 04:57 a.m.<br><b>Para:</b> Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>; Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard@gmail.com>; Vanda Scartezini <vanda@scartezini.org><br><b>CC:</b> ALAC <alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org><br><b>Asunto:</b> Re: [ALAC] Auction proceeds survey<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>Dear Alan,<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On 08/05/2018 07:30, Alan Greenberg wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><p class=MsoNormal>- Regarding the "open Internet" issue. I strongly support it staying. We will still need to consider the ICANN mission, but if we restrict things too much, we will end up doing ONLY things that ICANN itself could or should be doing and we will have lost a HUGE opportunity to do really good things with what is likely to be close to 1/4 of a billion dollars. If we end up wasting that, it would be a pity.<o:p></o:p></p></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal><br>I support the "open Internet" but the problem I have is that there are calls to define what the "open Internet" is. It just smells like another debate to define what "the public interest" is.<br>Kindest regards,<br><br>Olivier<o:p></o:p></p></div></body></html>