<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">Thanks Julie.  The SSAC reports are to be favoured, especially the clarity of rejection.</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">-Carlton</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><br>==============================<br><i><font face="comic sans ms, sans-serif">Carlton A Samuels</font></i><br><font face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><i>Mobile: 876-818-1799<br><font color="#33CC00">Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround</font></i></font><br>=============================</div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 6:06 PM, Julie Hammer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:julie.hammer@bigpond.com" target="_blank">julie.hammer@bigpond.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">Hi Everyone,<div><br></div><div>Please note that the following SSAC Reports have been published:</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><b>SAC093: SSAC Comments on the Draft Recommendations of the CCWG-
Accountability-WS2 on SO/AC Accountability dated 18 May 2017</b></div><div><br></div><div>In summary, the SSAC:</div><div>- agrees that it would be beneficial to determine and implement those best practices which are applicable
to SSAC’s structure and purpose</div><div>- does not believe it is appropriate to incorporate an implementation review into the
scope of future ATRTs</div><div>- suggests that it would be more appropriate to incorporate such a review into the 5-yearly
independent organizational reviews</div><div>- does not support the formal “Accountabillity Roundtable” as proposed</div><div>- suggests a more informal approach should be adopted, which involves the
exchange of views, experiences and best practices during the course of regularly
scheduled meetings between SO/AC chairs only</div><div>- agrees that the IRP should not be made applicable to activities of
SO/AC/Groups.</div><div><br></div><div><b><br></b></div><div><b>SAC094: SSAC Response to the Request for Advice Relating to the 2012
New gTLD Round dated 22 May 2017</b></div>
                
        
        
                <div class="m_-7575387948643868668page" title="Page 1">
                        <div class="m_-7575387948643868668layoutArea">
                                <div class="m_-7575387948643868668column"><p>This Report reviews and highlights in detail the recommendations from past SSAC Reports which have relevance to the 2012 New gTLD Round</p><p><br></p><p>Both Reports are attached and can also be found on the <a href="https://www.icann.org/groups/ssac/documents" target="_blank">SSAC Reports</a> webpage.</p><div><br></div><div>Cheers,  Julie</div>
                                </div>
                        </div>
                </div><div><br></div><div></div></div><br><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div></div></div><br><div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
ALAC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org">ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge-lists.icann.<wbr>org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br>
<br>
At-Large Online: <a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
ALAC Working Wiki: <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/<wbr>display/atlarge/At-Large+<wbr>Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>