<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><font color="#002e7a" class="">Alan,</font><div class=""><font color="#002e7a" class=""><br class=""></font></div><div class=""><font color="#002e7a" class="">I understand the issue of bandwidth but would accept the GNSO proposal because of the merit of the wide scope. In our comment we should note that we support the wide scope assuming that more time and more staff support would be provided to the review team.</font></div><div class=""><br class=""><div apple-content-edited="true" class="">
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); letter-spacing: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div apple-content-edited="true" class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">-----------------------------------------------------------------------------</span></div><div apple-content-edited="true" class=""><b class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">Tijani BEN JEMAA</span></b></div><div apple-content-edited="true" class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">Executive Director</span></div><div apple-content-edited="true" class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (</span><b style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">FMAI</b><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">)</span></div><div apple-content-edited="true" class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">Phone: +216 98 330 114</span></div><div apple-content-edited="true" class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class=""> </span> <span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class=""> +216 52 385 114</span></div><div apple-content-edited="true" class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class="">-----------------------------------------------------------------------------</span></div><div class=""><span style="color: rgb(54, 95, 145);" class=""><br class=""></span></div></div></div><br class=""></div><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Le 9 janv. 2017 à 05:07, Alan Greenberg <<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" class="">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>> a écrit :</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">I am attaching a document from the GNSO on the proposed RDS (formerly WHOIS) Review to be started very soon.<br class=""><br class="">You will recall that we previously had approved a narrowing of the scope of the RDS Review to focus just on the extent to which the previous WHOIS Review Recommendations had been implemented. This GNSO proposal widens the scope considerably. Although there is no question that the wider scope is interesting and ptentially useful, it will also require far more community involvement that the earlier proposal.<br class=""><br class="">The call for volunteers was to close on 13 January and a decision needs to be made quickly on exactly what the Review should be.<br class=""><br class="">Comments please, with some urgency.<br class=""><br class="">Alan<br class=""><br class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">From: "James M. Bladel" <<a href="mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com" class="">jbladel@godaddy.com</a>><br class="">Subject: Re: RDS Review<br class="">Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 17:42:53 +0000<br class=""><br class=""><br class="">Dear Karen and Community Leaders –<br class=""><br class="">The GNSO Council, working with its component Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies, has produced this document (attached), which outlines our feedback and concerns with the proposed “limited scope†for the upcoming RDS review. The document was submitted to ICANN Staff, and sharing with this team for your reference.<br class=""><br class="">Thank you,<br class=""><br class="">J.<br class="">----------------<br class="">James Bladel<br class="">GNSO Chair<br class=""></blockquote><span id="cid:889D0537-3F59-4F6A-846F-40B9265F3023" class=""><GNSO Council feedback on RDS.pdf></span>_______________________________________________<br class="">ALAC mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org" class="">ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br class=""><a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" class="">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br class=""><br class="">At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org<br class="">ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>