<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Thanks Alan,<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">If the case is that the review would be looking at the same issues that the WG would, then I would support reducing the scope as we did with the CCWG in order to avoid duplicative efforts.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">In any case I put my work where my mouth is and should there be the need to join the RDS WG, count me in.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><div class="">

<div class="">Best regards,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">León</div>

</div>

<br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">El 09/01/2017, a las 00:08, Alan Greenberg <<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" class="">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>> escribió:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">

<div class="">

To be clear, the issue was never staff support. The reduced scope came

from the volunteer community because of the worry that the same people

who were working on other RDS-related work (and particularly the GNSO

PDP) would be the ones to best serve on this RT.<br class=""><br class="">

That is largely the same logic used by the CCWG-Accountability for

suggesting that the scope of ATRT3 be reduced.<br class=""><br class="">

I'm not arguing for or against, just wanted to make sure we are all on

the same page.<br class=""><br class="">

Alan<br class=""><br class="">

At 09/01/2017 12:28 AM, LeÃ³n Felipe SÃ¡nchez AmbÃa wrote:<br class="">

<blockquote type="cite" class="cite" cite="">I agree with Tijani. The widened

scope seems justified although it will surely require more staff support.

<br class=""><br class="">

Kind regards,<br class=""><br class="">

LeÃ³n <br class=""><br class="">

Enviado desde mi iPhone<br class=""><br class="">

El ene. 8, 2017, a las 11:02 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA

<<a href="mailto:tijani.benjemaa@benjemaa.com" class="">

tijani.benjemaa@benjemaa.com</a>> escribiÃ³:<br class=""><br class="">

<blockquote type="cite" class="cite" cite=""><font color="#002E7A" class="">

Alan,</font><br class="">

<font color="#002E7A" class=""><br class="">

I understand the issue of bandwidth  but would accept the GNSO

proposal because of the merit of the wide scope. In our comment we should

note that we support the wide scope assuming that more time and more

staff support would be provided to the review team.<br class="">

</font><br class="">

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------<br class="">

<b class="">Tijani BEN JEMAA<br class="">

</b>Executive Director<br class="">

Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (<b class="">FMAI</b>)<br class="">

Phone: +216 98 330 114<br class="">

             +216 52 385 114<br class="">

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------<br class="">

<br class="">

<br class="">

<blockquote type="cite" class="cite" cite="">Le 9 janv. 2017 Ã  05:07,

Alan Greenberg

<<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" class="">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>

> a Ã©crit :<br class=""><br class="">

I am attaching a document from the GNSO on the proposed RDS (formerly

WHOIS) Review to be started very soon.<br class=""><br class="">

You will recall that we previously had approved a narrowing of the scope

of the RDS Review to focus just on the extent to which the previous WHOIS

Review Recommendations had been implemented. This GNSO proposal widens

the scope considerably. Although there is no question that the wider

scope is interesting and ptentially useful, it will also require far more

community involvement that the earlier proposal.<br class=""><br class="">

The call for volunteers was to close on 13 January and a decision needs

to be made quickly on exactly what the Review should be.<br class=""><br class="">

Comments please, with some urgency.<br class=""><br class="">

Alan<br class=""><br class="">

<br class="">

<blockquote type="cite" class="cite" cite="">From: "James M.

Bladel"

<<a href="mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com" class="">jbladel@godaddy.com</a>><br class="">

Subject: Re: RDS Review<br class="">

Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 17:42:53 +0000<br class=""><br class="">

<br class="">

Dear Karen and Community Leaders <br class=""><br class="">

The GNSO Council, working wiith its component Stakeholder Groups and

Constituencies, has produced this document (attached), which outlines our

feedback and concerns with the proposed Ã¢limited scopeÃ¢ for the

upcominoming RDS review.  The document was submitted to ICANN Staff,

and sharing with this team for your reference.<br class=""><br class="">

Thank you,<br class=""><br class="">

J.<br class="">

----------------<br class="">

James Bladel<br class="">

GNSO Chair</blockquote><GNSO Council feedback on

RDS.pdf>_______________________________________________<br class="">

ALAC mailing list<br class="">

<a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org" class="">

ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br class="">

<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" eudora="autourl" class="">

https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br class=""><br class="">

At-Large Online:

<a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org/" class="">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a>

<br class="">

ALAC Working Wiki:

<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)" class="">

https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a>

</blockquote><br class="">

_______________________________________________<br class="">

ALAC mailing list<br class="">

<a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org" class="">

ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br class="">

<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" eudora="autourl" class="">

https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br class=""><br class="">

At-Large Online:

<a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org/" class="">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a>

<br class="">

ALAC Working Wiki:

<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)" class="">

https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a>

</blockquote></blockquote></div>

</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>