<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Thanks Olivier. I think A is a better option<br><br><div style="direction: inherit;">Saludos,</div><div style="direction: inherit;"><br></div><div style="direction: inherit;"><br></div><div style="direction: inherit;">León</div></div><div><br>El oct. 7, 2016, a las 9:22 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <<a href="mailto:ocl@gih.com">ocl@gih.com</a>> escribió:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
Dear ALAC members,<br>
<br>
The ATLAS II Implementation Task Force is actively following up on
the ATLAS II Recommendations contained in the At-Large Declaration
drafted during the second At-Large Summit that took place in London
in June 2014.<br>
<br>
I would like to draw your attention to Recommendation 6:<br>
Ref. <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://community.icann.org/x/LpZCAw">https://community.icann.org/x/LpZCAw</a><br>
<font color="#ff0000">ICANN’s MSM should serve as the reference in
encouraging all participants (individuals or parties) to declare
and update existing or potential conflicts-of-interest, each time
a vote takes place or consensus is sought.</font><br>
<br>
The ALT has discussed this point last night. <br>
The proposal is:<br>
A - that the ALAC follows the GNSO's example in requiring ALAC
members and liaisons to state any changes to their SOI at the
beginning of every monthly teleconference or<br>
B - The alternative is to mention at the beginning of every ALAC and
ALT meeting (and hopefully RALO meetings too, although I am aware no
vote takes place there) that members should keep their SOI updated.<br>
<br>
My feeling is that it would be also helpful to have a link to the
SOI page included each time in this agenda item, should anyone wish
to update their SOI on the spot.<br>
FYI - SOI pages are on:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+New+SOIs+Workspace">https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+New+SOIs+Workspace</a><br>
<br>
We could go further and encourage any members of a working group to
have an SOI --- but this would go further than the recommendation
since no votes usually take place in working groups. Perhaps this
could be a best practice recommendation to working group chairs?<br>
<br>
So what is your preference: A or B?<br>
Or are there any objections to both options?<br>
<br>
Kindest regards,<br>
<br>
Olivier<br>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>ALAC mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org">ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a></span><br><span></span><br><span>At-Large Online: <a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a></span><br><span>ALAC Working Wiki: <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)">https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a></span></div></blockquote></body></html>