<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /></head><body>Yes. Just replied to your previous message with comments on 8 and 9.<br>
<br>
Alan <br>
-- <br>
Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On May 22, 2016 6:58:01 PM EDT, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">I did a little wordle of the answers to Q8. Actually quite helpful in identifying engendered group think! </div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br /></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">I'm curious. See the individual 360 Reviews and the responses for Q9. I'm presuming the comments are open to all members and each line as reported represents an individual comment, attributable to 1 and only one member?</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br /></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">If my presumptions are correct, Hmmmm....the courage of their convictions perhaps?</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans
ms,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br /></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;font-size:small">-Carlton</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all" /><div><div class="gmail_signature"><br />==============================<br />Carlton A Samuels<br />Mobile: 876-818-1799<br /><i><font color="#33CC00">Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround</font></i><br />=============================</div></div>
<br /><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Alan Greenberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" target="_blank">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I have been asked about the possibility of feedback on the returning candidates.<br />
<br />
In preparation for calling for nominations and for the selection phase, I did ask the Chair of the NomCom for such feedback. I was told that the NomCom self-evaluates itself and all of the members and publishes the reports (and was probably the only ICANN group to do so) - see <a href="https://www.icann.org/nomcom2015" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/nomcom2015</a>. These evaluations will be available at the end of the selection process. Despite our desire to know how well our delegates are doing, he did not consider it fair to NomCom members for the NomCom Leadership Team to provide personal opinions outside of the evaluation process.<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br />
<br />
Alan</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br />
<br />
At 20/05/2016 09:47 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:<br />
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
As you know, the ALAC must select five delegates, one per region, to the 2017 Nominating committee.<br />
<br />
The applicable section of the ICANN Bylaws reads: "The ALAC shall, after consultation with each RALO, annually appoint five voting delegates (no two of whom shall be citizens of countries in the same Geographic Region, as defined according to Section 5 of Article VI) to the Nominating Committee."<br />
<br />
The regions have all made their recommendations to the ALAC. They are:<br />
<br />
AFRALO: Dave Kissoondoyal (2nd of 2 years)<br />
APRALO: Amir Qayyum (2nd of 2 years)<br />
EURALO: Sandra Hoferichter<br />
LACRALO: José Ovidio Salgueiro<br />
NARALO: Eduardo Diaz (2nd of 2 years)<br />
<br />
The ALAC must consider the RALO recommendations, but is not obliged to follow them.<br />
<br />
In preparation for formally appointing delegates, there will be an agenda item on next week's ALAC meeting. If, for any reason, you believe that we should not follow any of these recommendations, please let me know privately, and the ALAC will meet in confidential session to discuss the recommendations.<br />
<br />
Alan<br />
</blockquote>
<br />
_______________________________________________<br />
ALAC mailing list<br />
<a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org" target="_blank">ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br />
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br />
<br />
At-Large Online: <a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a><br />
ALAC Working Wiki: <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a><br />
</div></div></blockquote></div><br /></div>
</blockquote></div></body></html>