<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Thanks Alan. I fully support the decision. <br><br>Kind regards ,<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>León</div></div><div><br>El 2 dic 2015, a las 10:53 PM, Alan Greenberg <<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>> escribió:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
Given that this was explicitly supported by a number of ALAC members and
objected to by none (with one ALAC Member believing that the charter
should be explicitly changed), I will report to the CWG- Stewardship at
its meeting tomorrow that the ALAC supports the plan.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
<br><br>
At 16/11/2015 10:45 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite" class="cite" cite="">Please see following message.
<br><br>
I believe this makes sense. If anyone has concerns with this, please let
us know. Based on any negative comments, I will initiate a Consensus Call
or formal vote next Monday, 23 November. The Consensus Call or vote will
be for ALAC Members only, but of course, the discussion is open to anyone
on this list.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
<blockquote type="cite" class="cite" cite="">To: ALAC, CCNSO, GAC, GNSO,
SSAC<br>
Cc: CWG-Stewardship, ICG, CRISP, IANAPLAN, CCWG-Accountability, ICANN
Implementation & ICANN Policy Staff. <br><br>
<br>
Dear Chartering Organizations of the CWG IANA Stewardship, <br>
<br>
<b>Subject: CWG-Stewardship role in implementation<br>
</b><br>
At ICANN54 in Dublin, the IANA Stewardship Coordination Group (ICG)
confirmed designation of the operational communities to be responsible
for direct implementation oversight of their proposals. <br>
<br>
The CWG-Stewardship also met during the course of ICANN54 and discussed
this role and we continued this discussion in a subsequent meeting on
Thursday 5 November 2015. An oversight role is not specifically detailed
in our Charter, but it is the CWG-Stewardship?s view that our role in
implementation is to ensure that the implementation is consistent with
the CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal and furthermore, to provide input on
the implementation work when required by staff working on the
implementation or, if and when necessary, to bring the implementation
work back in line with the intent of the Final Proposal. <br>
<br>
In our view, the most logical option is to have the CWG-Stewardship
working group continue in its current form and with the responsibility to
monitor the implementation and provide input where needed. Of course,
this responsibility would include regular updates to the Chartering
Organizations via the appointed members as well as consultations with the
Chartering Organizations should issues be identified that are deemed
without this specific remit. <br>
<br>
We note here for your information, that while the CWG-Stewardship Final
Proposal was submitted in June 2015, the CWG-Stewardship has remained
active and therefore available when needed. This has included being
available to answer questions from the ICG, or to monitor the
CCWG-Accountability dependencies and to coordinate with the other
operational communities on shared issues such as IANA intellectual
property rights. <br>
<br>
As the CWG-Stewardship Charter does not specifically address
implementation, we would like to ensure that the CWG-Stewardship?s
proposed approach in relation to implementation is not inconsistent with
the intent of the Chartering Organizations concerning the scope and role
of the CWG-Stewardship. We therefore propose to proceed to oversee the
implementation work as described above unless there are objections from
one or more Chartering Organizations. <br>
<br>
We would like to emphasize that the CWG-Stewardship does not intend to
change its working methods in light of this ongoing role. The group will
remain open to anyone who wishes to join, and we will welcome informed
individuals with relevant implementation and operational experience to
join the CWG-Stewardship in this next phase. <br>
<br>
Thank you for your consideration of this matter and for your ongoing
support of our work. Please let us know of any concerns by no later than
30 November 2015. <br>
<br>
Jonathan Robinson & Lise Fuhr <br>
CWG-Stewardship
co-Chairs</blockquote>_______________________________________________<br>
ALAC mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org">ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac" eudora="autourl">
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a><br><br>
At-Large Online:
<a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org/" eudora="autourl">
http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
ALAC Working Wiki:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC" eudora="autourl">
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC</a>
)</blockquote>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>ALAC mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org">ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac</a></span><br><span></span><br><span>At-Large Online: <a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a></span><br><span>ALAC Working Wiki: <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)">https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a></span></div></blockquote></body></html>