<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.23588">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=宋体>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=宋体>Hi, All,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=宋体></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=宋体>I support the expansion of the CWG's role as expressed
in this email.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=宋体></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=宋体>Best regards,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=宋体>Kaili</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=宋体></FONT> </DIV></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=宋体></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=宋体></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 9pt 宋体">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 9pt 宋体; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca">Alan
Greenberg</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 9pt 宋体"><B>To:</B> <A title=alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org
href="mailto:alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org">ALAC</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 9pt 宋体"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, November 16, 2015 11:45
PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 9pt 宋体"><B>Subject:</B> [ALAC] Discussion: CWG-Stewardship
role in implementation</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Please see following message. <BR><BR>I believe this makes
sense. If anyone has concerns with this, please let us know. Based on any
negative comments, I will initiate a Consensus Call or formal vote next
Monday, 23 November. The Consensus Call or vote will be for ALAC Members only,
but of course, the discussion is open to anyone on this
list.<BR><BR>Alan<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite cite="" type="cite">To: ALAC, CCNSO, GAC, GNSO,
SSAC<BR>Cc: CWG-Stewardship, ICG, CRISP, IANAPLAN, CCWG-Accountability,
ICANN Implementation & ICANN Policy Staff. <BR><BR><BR>Dear Chartering
Organizations of the CWG IANA Stewardship, <BR> <BR><B>Subject:
CWG-Stewardship role in implementation<BR></B><BR>At ICANN54 in Dublin, the
IANA Stewardship Coordination Group (ICG) confirmed designation of the
operational communities to be responsible for direct implementation
oversight of their proposals. <BR> <BR>The CWG-Stewardship also met
during the course of ICANN54 and discussed this role and we continued this
discussion in a subsequent meeting on Thursday 5 November 2015. An oversight
role is not specifically detailed in our Charter, but it is the
CWG-Stewardship’s view that our role in implementation is to ensure that the
implementation is consistent with the CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal and
furthermore, to provide input on the implementation work when required by
staff working on the implementation or, if and when necessary, to bring the
implementation work back in line with the intent of the Final Proposal.
<BR> <BR>In our view, the most logical option is to have the
CWG-Stewardship working group continue in its current form and with the
responsibility to monitor the implementation and provide input where needed.
Of course, this responsibility would include regular updates to the
Chartering Organizations via the appointed members as well as consultations
with the Chartering Organizations should issues be identified that are
deemed without this specific remit. <BR> <BR>We note here for your
information, that while the CWG-Stewardship Final Proposal was submitted in
June 2015, the CWG-Stewardship has remained active and therefore available
when needed. This has included being available to answer questions from the
ICG, or to monitor the CCWG-Accountability dependencies and to coordinate
with the other operational communities on shared issues such as IANA
intellectual property rights. <BR> <BR>As the CWG-Stewardship Charter
does not specifically address implementation, we would like to ensure that
the CWG-Stewardship’s proposed approach in relation to implementation is not
inconsistent with the intent of the Chartering Organizations concerning the
scope and role of the CWG-Stewardship. We therefore propose to proceed to
oversee the implementation work as described above unless there are
objections from one or more Chartering Organizations. <BR> <BR>We would
like to emphasize that the CWG-Stewardship does not intend to change its
working methods in light of this ongoing role. The group will remain open to
anyone who wishes to join, and we will welcome informed individuals with
relevant implementation and operational experience to join the
CWG-Stewardship in this next phase. <BR> <BR>Thank you for your
consideration of this matter and for your ongoing support of our work.
Please let us know of any concerns by no later than 30 November 2015.
<BR> <BR>Jonathan Robinson & Lise Fuhr <BR>CWG-Stewardship
co-Chairs</BLOCKQUOTE>
<P>
<HR>
<P></P>_______________________________________________<BR>ALAC mailing
list<BR>ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.org<BR>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac<BR><BR>At-Large
Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org<BR>ALAC Working Wiki:
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>