<html>
<body>
Sebastien, I passed this by all ALAC members and there were quite a
number of explicit supports and no objections. <br><br>
Moreover, this has selectively been the process followed since the new
Rules of Procedure were approved which explicitly allows for such a
process. The issue was well discussed at the time the RoP were being
revised and it was generally felt (perhaps unanimously - cannot recall)
that continuity in these crucial positions, and the relationship formed
between the Liaison and the target body was a major concern.<br><br>
Regarding the timing, as far as I can recall, Liaisons have always been
selected by the outgoing ALAC. That goes as far back as 2006 when I was
first selected as Liaison to the GNSO by the outgoing ALAC (when I recall
you were an ALAC Member).<br><br>
The issue will be on the agenda for tomorrow's meeting and the ALAC can
decide the way forward.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
At 21/09/2015 02:15 PM, Sébastien Bachollet wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Hello,<br>
Disclamer<br>
I am not member of ALAC.<br>
My point of view is in no way link with the people – all four I trust
very much and I thanks them to take the time and to be willing to do it
another year.<br>
I am not candidat to any of those position.<br><br>
<br>
But I want to express my deep concern.<br>
I disagree both with the process and the timing.<br>
Accountability and transparency must be at the heart of ALAC (and
At-Large).<br>
To keep the same people again and again with no possibility for other (at
least) to be candidate is not the best way to be inclusive.<br>
We need to have an open process.<br>
It must be a decision of the « new » ALAC seated at the end of the AGM in
Dublin.<br><br>
All the best<br><br>
<font face="Calibri">Sébastien Bachollet<br>
+33 6 07 66 89 33<br>
</font>Blog:
<a href="http://sebastien.bachollet.fr">http://sebastien.bachollet.fr</a>
/<br>
Mail: Sébastien Bachollet
<<a href="mailto:sebastien@bachollet.com">sebastien@bachollet.com</a>
><br><br>
De :
<<a href="mailto:alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org">
alac-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a>> on behalf of Alan Greenberg
<<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>
><br>
Date : lundi 21 septembre 2015 05:01<br>
À : ALAC
<<a href="mailto:alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org">
alac@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a>><br>
Objet : [ALAC] Liaison appointments for 2015-16<br><br>
<dl>
<dd>Our current ALAC-appointed Liaisons are:<br><br>
<dd>GNSO: Olivier Crepin-Leblond<br>
<dd>ccNSO: Maureen Hilyard<br>
<dd>SSAC: Julie Hammer<br>
<dd>.mobi: Murray McKercher<br><br>
<dd>According to ALAC RoP 18.2, "By the decision of the ALAC, a
current Appointee who is willing to continue in that role may be
reconfirmed instead of initiating a new selection process."<br><br>
<dd>Following consultation with ALAC Members, I conclude that there is
widespread agreement that we extend the appointment of all four Liaisons
for the coming year.<br><br>
<dd>I will be asking that the ALAC make a formal decision on this at the
ALAC meeting on Tuesday. <br><br>
<dd>If you will not be able to attend the meeting, please arrange with
another ALAC member to vote on your behalf, and notify At-Large Staff of
this arrangement. You may either instruct the proxy-holder how to vote,
or you may allow them to vote as they wish (
<a href="http://tinyurl.com/ALAC-RoP-2013-04" eudora="autourl">
http://tinyurl.com/ALAC-RoP-2013-04</a>, Section 12.3)<br><br>
<dd>Alan<br>
<dd>_______________________________________________ ALAC mailing list
ALAC@atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
At-Large Online:
<a href="http://www.atlarge.icann.org">http://www.atlarge.icann.org</a>
ALAC Working Wiki:
<a href="https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)">
https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)</a>
<br>
</dl></blockquote></body>
</html>