[ALAC] [CPWG] PIR and Dot Org

[Maureen Hilyard]

PIR Advisory Committee had an ALAC Liaison  - it was Michel Tchonang from
the Cameroon. Are you suggesting we have a PIR or a DotOrg liaison on our
ALT+ team - to keep us in the loop WRT PIR activities? That's a thought.

M



On Sun, 5 Jan 2020, 3:52 PM Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, <ocl at gih.com> wrote:

> Dear Maureen,
>
> Just a thought, historically, when the DotMobi TLD was created, a formal
> DotMobi liaison with At-Large was mandated. Others will have details.
> Best wishes,
>
> Olivier
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 6 Jan 2020, at 01:40, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> http://www.circleid.com/posts/20200105_hilyard_has_a_historic_chance_to_activate_icann_at_large/
>
> Well that is certainly forcing our hand to take some action. But with
> arrows flying in all sorts of directions it has been difficult to know
> which one to follow, and I note there has been a break in the conversations
> on this topic.
>
> Interesting and very timely that Roberto raised the .org issue again in an
> earlier email today. I started a response until JZ reminded us that the
> thread was about .com
>
> I agree with Roberto's approach  - that we should focus on our role as the
> voice of At-Large end-users and offer some creative advice on how we might
> influence the behaviour of PIR and any future decisions they make that will
> impact on .org end-users. PIR/Ethos already presented a webinar and said
> all the right things.. but how can we be assured that they will stick to
> what they said that they would do in the future? Who will monitor this on
> behalf of ordinary end-users? Who will be represented on the Stewardship
> Council?
>
> At the same time we may also need to advise the ICANN Board about how they
> might deal with the ICANN-PIR/Ethos contract - especially Roberto's
> recommendation of some commitment from ICANN that ethical behaviour
> towards .org end-users will be built into it.
>
> We are aware that the Board is looking into every legal issue relating to
> how they can deal with matters that are being raised by letters that are
> flowing their way. We don't need to add more of the same.
>
> While i think it might be seen to be a simplistic approach, I believe that
> we should stick to what our job is and focus on advice to the Board and to
> PIR- but lets try to be creative about how we advise them, looking at the
> impacts on end-users from all perspectives.
>
> My 2c
> M
>
>
>    -
>
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20200105/6b48ce66/attachment.html>