[ALAC] Bad Actor Admission

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hello John

Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Fri, 1 Mar 2019, 15:01 John Laprise, <jlaprise at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi and thanks Olivier,
>
> My apologies for not being clear. I was suggesting a possible bylaws
> change where in ICANN org can ask the community to initiate policy
> development when it sees an urgent/important need that the community has
> not noticed.
>

SO: This suggest that the Board can't initiate this at the moment? Isn't
the ccwg-stewardship, icann accountability, and the ongoing ePDP good
examples of such?

Regards


> Sent from my Pixel 3XL
>
> John Laprise, Ph.D.
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2019, 7:07 AM Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear John,
>>
>> please be so kind to find my response below:
>>
>> On 01/03/2019 13:31, John Laprise wrote:
>>
>> Well said Evan and I share your concerns. If memory serves, so does the
>> Board as MSM threats is a strategic planning issue. Musing upon waking I
>> was wondering whether it would help if we could implement a mechanism
>> whereby ICANN org could ask the empowered community to implement a pdp?
>> This might've avoided the current epdp issue.
>>
>>
>> The ICANN Board and the Empowered Community cannot implement or launch
>> PDPs relating to gTLDs. The "PDP" as such is a defined term for "Policy
>> Development Process" and in the context of the Generic Names, only the GNSO
>> can launch a PDP. In the context of Country Codes Names, when it relates to
>> global policy, the ccNSO can launch a PDP.
>> The Board can ask the GNSO to launch a PDP on a gTLD related issue, but
>> the GNSO can refuse.
>>
>> The Board can also ask the ICANN communities, SOs/ACs to launch a Cross
>> Community Working Group (CCWG). However, there are doubts expressed in the
>> GNSO that CCWGs should *not* be the basis for policy making for gTLDs as
>> all policy making for gTLDs should go through a PDP.
>>
>> It's a power game and the bottom line is who has the control of policy
>> processes on gTLDs.
>> Kindest regards,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20190301/c20cb3bf/attachment.html>