[ALAC] Fwd: FOLLOW UP (Re: ICANN64 Cross Community Session: Next Steps in ICANN's Response to the GDPR)

Maureen Hilyard maureen.hilyard at gmail.com
Fri Mar 1 00:13:50 UTC 2019


Dear ALAC and ALT+

Here is a thread that has been received from Mary Wong (originally from
Steve DelBianco) about  ICANN64 Cross Community Session: Next Steps in
ICANN's Response to the GDPR.

For your information.  (Apologies for any cross-posting)
Maureen

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
Date: Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 7:24 AM
Subject: FOLLOW UP (Re: ICANN64 Cross Community Session: Next Steps in
ICANN's Response to the GDPR)
To: Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
Cc: Chantelle Doerksen <chantelle.doerksen at icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <
carlos.reyes at icann.org>, Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org>, Bruna
Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>,
Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>, Rod Rasmussen <rod at rodrasmussen.com>,
Maria Otanes <maria.otanes at icann.org>, Austin, Donna
<Donna.Austin at team.neustar>


Hello again Steve and everyone,



FYI that the session description is now up on the ICANN64 public meeting
schedule: https://64.schedule.icann.org/meetings/961913. I hope it is all
right that staff took the liberty of not including a mention of the GNSO
Council vote, as that will take place only on 4 March and the schedule is
viewable as of today. We will be sure to update the description accordingly
following the Council’s vote.



Once again, we remain available to assist you with planning and managing
the session. Please feel free to use this thread to continue any
discussions you may wish to have as regards organizing the session. Thank
you!



Cheers

Mary



*From: *Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
*Date: *Wednesday, February 27, 2019 at 23:06
*To: *Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
*Cc: *Chantelle Doerksen <chantelle.doerksen at icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <
carlos.reyes at icann.org>, Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org>, Bruna
Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>,
Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>, Rod Rasmussen <rod at rodrasmussen.com>,
Maria Otanes <maria.otanes at icann.org>, "Austin, Donna"
<Donna.Austin at team.neustar>
*Subject: *Re: [Ext] Re: ICANN64 Cross Community Session: Next Steps in
ICANN's Response to the GDPR



Thank you, Steve! All, unless anyone has concerns about the proposed
session description, we will proceed to post it for now to the public
schedule (understanding, of course, that it can be updated following
additional discussions among this group)



Thanks and cheers

Mary



*From: *Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
*Date: *Wednesday, February 27, 2019 at 15:28
*To: *Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
*Cc: *Chantelle Doerksen <chantelle.doerksen at icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <
carlos.reyes at icann.org>, Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org>, Bruna
Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>,
Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>, Rod Rasmussen <rod at rodrasmussen.com>,
Maria Otanes <maria.otanes at icann.org>, "Austin, Donna"
<Donna.Austin at team.neustar>
*Subject: *[Ext] Re: ICANN64 Cross Community Session: Next Steps in ICANN's
Response to the GDPR



Here’s a proposed Session Description for *“Next Steps in ICANN’s Response
to the GDPR”*



The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) took effect May-2018,
prompting ICANN Org to change how it enforces Whois policies. The GNSO
launched an expedited policy development process (EPDP) to replace a
Temporary Specification that expires May-2019.  Last month, the EPDP
produced policy recommendations to replace the Temporary Specification, as
approved by the GNSO Council on 4-Mar. The ICANN Board is now accepting
public comments before it votes to approve the EPDP policy.



That’s what happened so far with GDPR and Whois.  This session will focus
on What Happens Next:

ICANN Org will work with a GNSO Implementation Review Team on details for
the new policy.

The EPDP will resume its work to resolve open questions from and to develop
policy for a system for standardized access to non-public registration data
(also known as a Unified Access Model)

ICANN Org and its Technical Study Group will continue work on technical
means to support a Unified Access Model.

ICANN Org will continue exploring legal framework to support a Unified
Access Model.

GNSO must decide whether and how to re-start policy development work that
had been set aside during the EPDP, including Privacy & proxy services and
the procedure for Whois conflicts with Privacy Law.

GNSO might even resume work on a new policy framework for registration
directory services (RDS).



Attend this session to understand and comment on policy work to reconcile
ICANN’s Whois policies with privacy laws and legitimate needs for
registrant data.









On 2/27/19, 2:48 PM, "Mary Wong" <mary.wong at icann.org> wrote:



Dear all,



This note is just a follow up to the initial message from last week
(below). As mentioned, we need to upload ASAP at least a tentative
placeholder Session Description to the public meeting schedule
(https://64.schedule.icann.org/meetings/961913
[64.schedule.icann.org]
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__64.schedule.icann.org_meetings_961913&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=h6lV6idkJeibtOnHMq1fwhRrJcKjxzCXyFwKvWFH5ZQ&s=kl3dNthSTLmUpM4JpiqFVCGdu8wg76Hin-3QTz81v1U&e=>)
to inform community members as they begin to plan their ICANN64 meeting
schedules.



We also hope that, by putting together via this email thread all the
community leaders who have expressed interest in either planning or having
their community groups participate in that session, we can help facilitate
a discussion as to the objectives, desired outcomes, preferred format and
speaker line-up. In that regard, I’ve been reminded that I should have
included Donna Austin (RySG) in the original email, so I have taken the
liberty of adding her name to this follow up note.



As always, please let Cyrus and me know how Org can assist with the
planning, management and logistics of this important session. Thank you!



Cheers

Mary



*From: *Mary Wong <mary.wong at icann.org>
*Date: *Friday, February 22, 2019 at 17:24
*To: *Steve DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
*Cc: *Chantelle Doerksen <chantelle.doerksen at icann.org>, Carlos Reyes <
carlos.reyes at icann.org>, Cyrus Namazi <cyrus.namazi at icann.org>, Bruna
Santos <bruna.mrtns at gmail.com>, Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>,
Manal Ismail <manal at tra.gov.eg>, Rod Rasmussen <rod at rodrasmussen.com>
*Subject: *ICANN64 Cross Community Session: Next Steps in ICANN's Response
to the GDPR



Dear Steve (and cc’ing Manal, Maureen, Bruna and Rod),



I am writing to you as the chairs of the SO/AC/SG/C groups that had
expressed interest in planning the *ICANN64 Cross Community session on
“Next Steps in ICANN’s Response to the GDPR”, scheduled for Monday 11 March
at 15.15*. I believe that this was a session that had first been proposed
by the BC and that, after the last planning call, there is general
agreement amongst the community leaders that the session ought to combine a
number of other proposals and suggestions (e.g. a unified access model and
other specific topics that may be of interest based on the work of the
Expedited PDP Team).



As we approach the final run-up to ICANN64, I hope that this email will
serve to kick off further discussions as to the scope and format of the
session. In this regard, please note the following points:



   - In accordance with what has become the regular practice, Cyrus (cc’d)
   will be ICANN org’s designated senior executive for the session.
   - Members of the Policy Team (including me and Carlos Reyes) will be
   available to assist you with coordination, logistics, programming and
   overall management of the session. As such, we will need the following
   information at your earliest convenience:
      - A *session description* (for posting on the public schedule and
      meeting website) – this is the most urgently needed item at this point so
      even a placeholder description that can provide basic information to
      attendees looking at the meeting schedule will be fine; and
      - Your *preferred format and room setup* (e.g. will it be run as a
      panel with a moderator; how many speakers/panelists and who they are; how
      you wish to handle audience interaction and Q&A etc.).



Steve, as the BC initially proposed the session, perhaps you have some
ideas that you can share with Cyrus and the group. Thank you all!



Best regards,

Mary
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20190301/5f4b68b2/attachment.html>


More information about the ALAC mailing list