[ALAC] [CPWG] ALAC Statement to accompany EPDP Phase 1 FinalReport

[Kan Kaili]

+1


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Seun Ojedeji 
  To: Carlton Samuels 
  Cc: ALAC ; CPWG ; Alan Greenberg 
  Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2019 6:14 AM
  Subject: Re: [CPWG] [ALAC] ALAC Statement to accompany EPDP Phase 1 FinalReport


  If ALAC member support to Carlton's comments could make any difference, I do support this.

  While final draft has been replaced with "strong concerns" I think the last paragraph still reads that we object a number of sections yet we are supporting the entire package and that again doesn't read well.


  Regards


  Sent from my mobile
  Kindly excuse brevity and typos


  On Sat, 16 Feb 2019, 21:21 Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at gmail.com wrote:

    The ALAC is being asked to go along with the EPDP proposal despite our representative team's concerns with several aspects of the output.  It appears the decision is to 'go along to get along' and hope for better in Phase II. So we want to be seen as 'cooperative' without filing a minority report and appear obdurate, which as a chartered member, we have every right to do.  


    Maybe its because I generally hate these 'one-the-one-hand-and on-the-other-hand' tomes. They create confused minds and you come across looking like nitpickers.  


    So, might I suggest that for this exercise in diplomacy, you will have to use the labels 'concern[s]' and 'difficulty' with a bit more precision.  Maybe a suggestion from the language used by my university's Finance and General Purpose  [management] Committee would help.



    When a member object to any portion of a resolution or decision and it appears non-negotiable, the member maintains integrity by saying they have a 'difficulty' with the specific topic and cannot support it.  


    Expressing 'a concern' means that the current view could be adjusted and there is room for negotiations. 


    -Carlton  

    ==============================
    Carlton A Samuels
    Mobile: 876-818-1799
    Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
    =============================




    On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:38 PM Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

      As discussed today the statement has been modified to address the 
      issues raised on the CPWG teleconference. The SSAC has also issue a 
      statement 
      (https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/2019-February/001682.html) 
      and I took the opportunity to add a few comments prompted by their document.

      A redline and clean version is attached.

      Alan_______________________________________________
      ALAC mailing list
      ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
      https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

      At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
      ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
    _______________________________________________
    ALAC mailing list
    ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
    https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

    At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
    ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  CPWG mailing list
  CPWG at icann.org
  https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20190218/bf8808c5/attachment.html>