[ALAC] Suggested revision of At-Large Policy Development template

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Sun May 13 01:47:18 UTC 2018

We may well need a better process to handle 
issues where there are differeing opinions. To be 
honest, at times we have not had sufficient 
differeing opinions for that to matter, so if we 
do have such a situation now, I find it rather refreshing.

But to be clear, the change documented here is 
just to better track revised drafts as they come 
up, not necessarily due to differing opinions 
(although there was a bit of that here).


At 12/05/2018 09:33 PM, Holly Raiche wrote:

>I would hope this becomes an item  for the 
>revised policy committee.  We do need a better 
>way to handle statements when there are numerous 
>comments - particularly when there is disagreement amongst them
>On 11 May 2018, at 4:37 am, Alan Greenberg 
><<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>>We have again had a problem with the original 
>>comment being changed without clear notice and causing confusion.
>>I have investigated whether Maureen suggestion 
>>is possible (have additional DRAFT boxes be 
>>added as needed) and found that this is not 
>>practical for a number of reasons (a) it would 
>>have to be done by staff since non-staff do not 
>>have the privileges to alter these macros; b) 
>>few staff have the skills; c) having specific 
>>staff do it on a tight time-frame is not 
>>practical). In light of that, I have instructed 
>>that staff modify the pages to give clear 
>>instructions for what can be done without 
>>extensive training or staff time to address the issue.
>>At 01/02/2018 11:07 PM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>>>This happens relatively infrequently. Why 
>>>create a new process that requires staff 
>>>intervention when simply stacking the version 
>>>in the box now called DRAFT(s) will do. And it 
>>>allows for more than two version is required?
>>>At 01/02/2018 09:54 PM, Maureen Hilyard wrote:
>>>>But as Holly said, sometimes you just need 
>>>>another space to reorganise your thoughts 
>>>>before it becomes the final draft... although 
>>>>sometimes it ends up as the final draft..
>>>>But you are only currently given 2 options, first and final..
>>>>There should be two boxes to start off with, 
>>>>and the penholder can ask for another one if 
>>>>required  as a transition section before the 
>>>>final statement . But it should be 
>>>>highlighted in another colour what changes have been made.
>>>>On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Alan 
>>>>Greenberg <<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca > wrote:
>>>>When I was drafting more statements, I also 
>>>>would often post my "first draft" in the 
>>>>comment area and move it up if it had general 
>>>>acceptance. But there will always be cases 
>>>>where there are multiple draft versions 
>>>>posted and I was trying to find a really easy 
>>>>path for doing that without losing history 
>>>>along the way. Having staff create new boxes 
>>>>along the ways seems likea much more challenging way to address the problem...
>>>>At 01/02/2018 04:33 PM, Maureen Hilyard wrote:
>>>>>I think there is room for having personal 
>>>>>comments remaining at the bottom of the wiki 
>>>>>page, but drafts of the statement should be 
>>>>>able to be inserted as they develop. It 
>>>>>might mean teaching penholders how to create 
>>>>>these boxes for new drafts or asking the new 
>>>>>policy support staff person to create one for them.
>>>>>On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Holly 
>>>>>Raiche <<mailto:h.raiche at internode.on.net> h.raiche at internode.on.net> wrote:
>>>>>Makes sense to me.  When I died to post a 
>>>>>‘firirst draft’ of f the privacy 
>>>>>stuff, I couldn̢۪t, and so put stuff in tn 
>>>>>the ‘comment’ ¬â„¢ space.  While that 
>>>>>whole wiki reflects pretty much what the 
>>>>>discussion was, it doesn̢۪t follow the concept of firfirst and final draft
>>>>>On 2 Feb 2018, at 6:40 am, Maureen Hilyard 
>>>>><<mailto:maureen.hilyard at gmail.com> maureen.hilyard at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>Sounds good to me because when you don't 
>>>>>>see the developments as new contributions 
>>>>>>are incorporated into the statements, it 
>>>>>>may seem as if its only just been ONE or only a few contributors
>>>>>>Some statements go through several transitions.
>>>>>>On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:42 AM, Alan 
>>>>>>Greenberg <<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca > wrote:
>>>>>>It has been pointed out to me that the 
>>>>>>template we use has a space for "First 
>>>>>>Draft" and then "Final Draft". This works 
>>>>>>for issues that do not generate a lot of 
>>>>>>dialogue and revision of the statement. For 
>>>>>>such statements, there is no specific place 
>>>>>>to post the revised version(s). Simply 
>>>>>>changing the first draft does not really 
>>>>>>work, because then we are left with Wiki 
>>>>>>comments on that draft that refer back to 
>>>>>>something that s no longer there (unless 
>>>>>>you go to the trouble of finding the correct earlier version).
>>>>>>I suggest that we change the title from 
>>>>>>STATEMENTS" and add instructions saying 
>>>>>>that if multiple draft versions are posted, 
>>>>>>old versions should remain, with the newer 
>>>>>>version posted at the top of the box, 
>>>>>>prefixed with the date posted and author, 
>>>>>>and separated from earlier versions by a horizontal line.
>>>>>>That way we have a full history of the draft evolution.
>>>>>>Does anyone see a reason not to do this?
>>>>>>ALAC mailing list
>>>>>><mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>>>>At-Large Online: 
>>>>>>ALAC Working Wiki: 
>>>>ALAC mailing list
>>>><mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>>At-Large Online: 
>>>>ALAC Working Wiki: 
>>ALAC mailing list
>><mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>ALAC Working Wiki: 
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline
>ALAC mailing list
>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>ALAC Working Wiki: 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180512/404b52e1/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the ALAC mailing list