[ALAC] Auction proceeds survey

Vanda Scartezini vanda at scartezini.org
Mon May 7 16:45:59 UTC 2018


Hi All. Create a foundation and add another baord is not an easy task and the general cost is not small. Moreover, this money is one shot money, then create an internal foundation may be a waste of resources and time.  Another point: Where will be placed the overseen of our community?
  Additionally, we need to be sure this foundation, if one can think about, can grant money outside to US in any region of this planet.
It is not a simple solution but all this need to be considered
Kisses
Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.





From: Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>
Date: Monday, May 7, 2018 at 10:38
To: John Laprise <jlaprise at gmail.com>
Cc: Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org>, 'ALAC List' <alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
Subject: Re: [ALAC] Auction proceeds survey

John, that sounds very similar to one of the organisations that did respond - my preferred option....   :)

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 3:32 AM, John Laprise <jlaprise at gmail.com<mailto:jlaprise at gmail.com>> wrote:
Curiously enough, I happen to work for a 501c3 non-profit that contains a charitable foundation (see www.rsna.org<http://www.rsna.org>) and asked one of our senior people to respond as an expert. We have a solution that is 3ish. My org has a board but the foundation internal to the org has it's own board which makes funding decisions according to it's mandate. Moreover, it also conducts fundraising for ongoing research grants
On Sun, May 6, 2018, 5:19 PM Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org<mailto:vanda at scartezini.org>> wrote:
Dear Alan, other  ALAC friends
 In the Auction proceeds CCWG we are asked to respond to a survey.
Since from the responses from this survey the proposals for the report will be more defined, we were encouraged to get some feedback from the group we are acting with, in this case ALAC, and share our ideas and get your feedbacks if possible
There are several questions but in my view some will define others and I would like to hear from you, your thoughts
 For me the relevant question is related to the model
Please take a look at https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP/CCWG+Charter
To understand the question.
 All financial resource shall be granted to projects under the mission of ICANN and only for that.

Sorry we have to finalize the survey till Miercoles May 9 , so if you can give feedback during Monday 7and Tuesday8 I really appreciate.

Here the options for the most relevant question in my opinion I would like to have some inputs before respond the survey: which will be the best option, think about process, cost, efficiency…

The working group has come up with 4 different possible mechanisms that could be considered:
1.       A New ICANN Proceeds Allocation Department is created as part of ICANN, the organisation (ICANN Org)- This department would be part of ICANN Org and take full responsibility for solicitation and evaluation of proposals, and disbursement process.
2.       New ICANN Proceeds Allocation Department Created as part of ICANN Org which would work in collaboration with an existing charitable organization(s) Responsibilities for solicitation and evaluation of proposals, and disbursement process would be split between the newly created department and the existing charitable organization(s).
3.       A new structure would be created (e.g. ICANN foundation) - A new structure would be created separate of ICANN Org which would be responsible for solicitation and evaluation of proposals, and disbursement process


4.       An established entity/entities (e.g. foundation or fund) are used (ICANN would organize the oversight of processes to ensure mission and fiduciary duties are met) - An stablished entity / entities (e.g. foundation or fund) would be responsible for solicitation and evaluation of proposals, and disbursement process.

Thank you


Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.




_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180507/5f1f7522/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ALAC mailing list