[ALAC] Auction proceeds survey

Mon May 7 13:36:50 UTC 2018

Hi Judith,

That's already been done. Introductory letter and survey delivered.

On Mon, May 7, 2018, 8:35 AM Judith Hellerstein <judith at jhellerstein.com>
wrote:

> HI John,
>
> Please send the name, phone number, and email address for your person and
> I can add it to the expert database.  Each of the experts receives an
> introductory letter and then a questionnaire.The responses to their
> questions will help us better understand how they review their proposals.
>
> Best,
>
> Judith
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
> Hellerstein & Associates3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008 <https://maps.google.com/?q=3001+Veazey+Terrace+NW,+Washington+DC+20008&entry=gmail&source=g>
> Phone: (202) 362-5139  Skype ID: judithhellerstein
> Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517
> E-mail: Judith at jhellerstein.com   Website: www.jhellerstein.com
> Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
> Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide
>
>
> On 5/7/2018 9:32 AM, John Laprise wrote:
>
> Curiously enough, I happen to work for a 501c3 non-profit that contains a
> charitable foundation (see www.rsna.org) and asked one of our senior
> people to respond as an expert. We have a solution that is 3ish. My org has
> a board but the foundation internal to the org has it's own board which
> makes funding decisions according to it's mandate. Moreover, it also
> conducts fundraising for ongoing research grants
>
> On Sun, May 6, 2018, 5:19 PM Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Alan, other  ALAC friends
>>
>>  In the Auction proceeds CCWG we are asked to respond to a survey.
>>
>> Since from the responses from this survey the proposals for the report
>> will be more defined, we were encouraged to get some feedback from the
>> group we are acting with, in this case ALAC, and share our ideas and get
>> your feedbacks if possible
>>
>> There are several questions but in my view some will define others and I
>> would like to hear from you, your thoughts
>>
>>  For me the relevant question is related to the model
>>
>> Please take a look at
>> https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP/CCWG+Charter
>>
>> To understand the question.
>>
>>  All financial resource shall be granted to projects under the mission of
>> ICANN and only for that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry we have to finalize the survey till Miercoles May 9 , so if you can
>> give feedback during Monday 7and Tuesday8 I really appreciate.
>>
>>
>>
>> Here the options for the most relevant question in my opinion I would
>> like to have some inputs before respond the survey: which will be the best
>> option, think about process, cost, efficiency…
>>
>>
>>
>> The working group has come up with 4 different possible mechanisms that
>> could be considered:
>>
>>    1. A New ICANN Proceeds Allocation *Department is created as part of
>>    ICANN*, the organisation (ICANN Org)- This department would be part
>>    of ICANN Org and *take full responsibility* for solicitation and
>>    evaluation of proposals, and disbursement process.
>>    2. New ICANN Proceeds Allocation *Department Created* as part of
>>    ICANN Org which would *work in collaboration with an existing
>>    charitable organization(*s) Responsibilities for solicitation and
>>    evaluation of proposals, and disbursement process would be split between
>>    the newly created department and the existing charitable organization(s).
>>    3. A *new structure would be created (e.g. ICANN foundation*) - A new
>>    structure would be created separate of ICANN Org which would be responsible
>>    for solicitation and evaluation of proposals, and disbursement process
>>
>>
>>
>>    1. *An established entity/entities* (e.g. foundation or fund) are
>>    used (*ICANN would organize the oversight of processes to ensure
>>    mission and fiduciary duties are met*) - An stablished entity /
>>    entities (e.g. foundation or fund) would be responsible for solicitation
>>    and evaluation of proposals, and disbursement process.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Vanda Scartezini*
>>
>> *Polo Consultores Associados*
>>
>> *Av. Paulista **1159, cj 1004*
>>
>> *01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil*
>>
>> *Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253*
>>
>> *Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 *
>>
>> *Sorry for any typos. *
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>> <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+%28ALAC%29>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing listALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki:
> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180507/07a74194/attachment.html>