[ALAC] [At-Large] NOI published by NTIA

Vanda Scartezini vanda at scartezini.org
Tue Jun 5 19:07:33 UTC 2018


As I read it, looks like a known maneuver to bring back old overseen.  At least they are learning with the Latinos, since here is this way that things change…

Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.





From: ALAC <alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 at 16:03
To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
Cc: 'ALAC List' <ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Subject: Re: [ALAC] [At-Large] NOI published by NTIA

Um, maybe this move is the old 'flag up the pole'. Consent can be manufactured, too.

On Tue, 5 Jun 2018, 12:49 pm Alan Greenberg, <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>> wrote:
HOW indeed!

Ignoring for the moment WHY, can you think of a
better way to force the creation of an alternate
route than by having the US Government seize
control of IANA, or even having ICANN give it back?

At 05/06/2018 10:53 AM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía wrote:

>The NOI includes some questions in relation to
>the IANA transition. Most precisely it raises
>the question on whether the transition should be unwound and if so, how?

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org<mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac

At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180605/e04bfc08/attachment.html>


More information about the ALAC mailing list