[ALAC] Consensus Call: EDPD - Proposed way forward

[Alan Greenberg]

You have to be careful here. If all that out 
Members could say was exactly what the ALAC had 
formally agreed, it would always be very out of 
date and we would not need three people to do this, we could send an e-mail!

This EPDP will be moving very quickly and there 
is no way we can have formal or informal approval 
while meetings are going on and other people are 
putting out new ideas and proposals.

What we need are agreed to general principles and 
people who understand them and what the INTENT of 
the ALAC and At-Large is. ANd regular 
opportunities to share what is going on and ask 
for direction if the way forward is not clear.

Alan

At 07/07/2018 09:32 PM, asoto at ibero-americano.org wrote:

>Agree, but prior agreement. Otherwise, it would 
>be the personal opinions of our representatives, not the opinions of ALAC.
>
>Regards
>
>Alberto
>
>El 2018-07-07 18:42, Alan Greenberg escribió:
>>Indeed, thus the last sentence of #1 and #6 as well as time
>>requirement to attend At-Large calls. As the EPDP runs, there will no
>>doubt be many details to be defined, but the overall guidance will be
>>to look at what maximizes the benefits to Internet users and what
>>minimizes the potential harms.
>>Alan
>>At 07/07/2018 05:38 PM, Jonathan Zuck wrote:
>>
>>Links:
>>------
>>[1]
>>https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/proposed-epdp-membership-structure-temp-spec-27jun18-en.pdf
>>[2] https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>[3] http://www.atlarge.icann.org/
>>[4]
>>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC
>>_______________________________________________
>>ALAC mailing list
>>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>ALAC Working Wiki:
>>https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)