[ALAC] Community Feedback on Proposed models for RDS - by the end of January

Sebicann Bachollet sebicann at bachollet.fr
Sun Jan 14 20:15:20 UTC 2018


Yes Holly
It is exactly what I was pointing out.
SeB


> Le 14 janv. 2018 à 20:35, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net> a écrit :
> 
> Hi Sebastian
> 
> I did read the words.  But seriously, he is asking for a response - whatever it is  called.  And given the importance of the issue, we should respond - whatever we call it.
> 
> Holly
> On 15 Jan 2018, at 3:05 am, Sebicann Bachollet <sebicann at bachollet.fr <mailto:sebicann at bachollet.fr>> wrote:
> 
>> No comment but feedback ;)
>> "To help inform this, please provide your feedback by 29 January 2018. Please send your feedback to gdpr at icann.org <mailto:gdpr at icann.org>. »
>> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/data-protection-and-privacy-update-seeking-community-feedback-on-proposed-compliance-models <https://www.icann.org/news/blog/data-protection-and-privacy-update-seeking-community-feedback-on-proposed-compliance-models>
>> SeB
>> 
>>> Le 14 janv. 2018 à 16:39, Glenn McKnight <mcknight.glenn at gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>> 
>>> Hi Holly
>>> Interesting you mentioned this issue, two things to share with you
>>> 
>>> 1.  NCUC did a session at the IGF and curious if anyone followed their tread. they had a good google doc on the issues
>>> 2. NARALO is having monthly hot topics during the second half of our monthly membership calls. I was thinking of this issue as a topic for March since I have Cybersecurity as the February topic.   I will need someone to level set the issue.  We had Net Neutrality for January
>>> 
>>> Glenn
>>> 
>>> Glenn McKnight
>>> NARALO Secretariat
>>> mcknight.glenn at gmail.com <mailto:mcknight.glenn at gmail.com>
>>> skype  gmcknight
>>> twitter gmcknight
>>> 289-830 6259
>>> .
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 1:07 AM, Holly Raiche <h.raiche at internode.on.net <mailto:h.raiche at internode.on.net>> wrote:
>>> Folks
>>> 
>>> Two days ago, Goran’s blog posted ICANN’s proposed there models for addressing the issue of RDS information and the EU Data Protection rules.  According to the blog, 'community input' is being sought - by the end of January.
>>> 
>>> Given the significance of this discussion on the information that registries/registrars collect and display, I am assuming that ALAC will be making comments? We should, at the least, have a page on the wiki for comments???
>>> 
>>> Holly
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ALAC mailing list
>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
>>> 
>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org <http://www.atlarge.icann.org/>
>>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC) <https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ALAC mailing list
>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org <mailto:ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac>
>>> 
>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180114/7496be7a/attachment.html>


More information about the ALAC mailing list