[ALAC] EPDP Early input

Holly Raiche h.raiche at internode.on.net
Tue Aug 28 19:17:03 UTC 2018


Thanks Marita

I like your wording.  Ys it is a big document and I like your wording as to wha it is in the report that we endorse.  

Holly
On 29 Aug 2018, at 1:18 am, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:

> Marita, I am not sure that your synopsis is all that different from endorsing the entire paper when you start examining the rationales, but I would be happy to accept that if we can get closure on it quickly. Time is our enemy in this overall EPDP process.
> 
> Alan
> 
> 
> At 28/08/2018 10:38 AM, Marita Moll wrote:
> 
>> Sorry to have missed the call -- still confusing midnight Monday with midnight Tuesday -- I guess I will get used to the format.
>> 
>> I just read this really well done SSAC report which is clear and thorough. But there is a lot in there. I wonder if we should do a blanket endorsement of everything without careful analysis. 
>> 
>> Could we not have a more nuanced position? For example, we could say that, in line with our mandate to support end-users, we support SSAC's position on ensuring that security professionals and law enforcement have adequate access to WHOIS/RDS data. 
>> 
>> If that is the point we want to make.
>> 
>> Marita
>> 
>> On 8/28/2018 2:23 AM, Alan Greenberg wrote:
>>> As I mentioned on the ALAC call that has just completed, all EPDP participant groups have been given the opportunity to provide "early input" into the EPDP. 
>>> 
>>> So far, the SSAC and the NCSG has done so. Their input can be found at https://community.icann.org/x/Ag9pBQ.
>>> 
>>> The SSAC's input consisted of their recent report SAC101. A copy is attached for your convenience.
>>> 
>>> I would like to suggest that the ALAC submit a statement saying that we support SAC101, as it is in line with our stated position of trying to ensure that security professionals and law enforcement have adequate access to WHOIS/RDS data.
>>> 
>>> I open the floor for discussion and will initiate a Consensus Call later in the week.
>>> 
>>> Alan 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ALAC mailing list
>>> 
>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> 
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>> 
>>> At-Large Online:
>>> http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>>> 
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>> 
>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC )
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
> 
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/alac/attachments/20180829/643671cc/attachment.html>


More information about the ALAC mailing list